Sarrett David C
Virginia Commonwealth University, 1012 East Marshall Street, P.O. Box 980549, Richmond, VA 23298-0549, USA.
Dent Mater. 2005 Jan;21(1):9-20. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2004.10.001.
Posterior composite restorations have been in use for approximately 30 years. The early experiences with this treatment indicated there were more clinical challenges and higher failure rates than amalgam restorations. Since the early days of posterior composites, many improvements in materials, techniques, and instruments for placing these restorations have occurred. This paper reviews what is known regarding current clinical challenges with posterior composite restorations and reviews the primary method for collecting clinical performance data. This review categorizes the challenges as those related to the restorative materials, those related to the dentist, and those related to the patient. The clinical relevance of laboratory tests is discussed from the perspective of solving the remaining clinical challenges of current materials and of screening new materials. The clinical problems related to early composite materials are no longer serious clinical challenges. Clinical data indicate that secondary caries and restoration fracture are the most common clinical problems and merit further investigation. The effect of the dentist and patient on performance of posterior composite restorations is unclear and more clinical data from hypothesis-driven clinical trials are needed to understand these factors. Improvements in handling properties to ensure void-free placement and complete cure should be investigated to improve clinical outcomes. There is a general lack of data that correlates clinical performance with laboratory materials testing. A proposed list of materials tests that may predict performance in a variety of clinical factors is presented. Polymerization shrinkage and the problems that have been attributed to this property of composite are reviewed. There is a lack of evidence that indicates polymerization shrinkage is the primary cause of secondary caries. It is recommended that composite materials be developed with antibacterial properties as a way of reducing failures due to secondary caries. Post-operative sensitivity appears to be more related to the dentin adhesives' ability to seal open dentinal tubules rather than the effects of polymerization shrinkage on cuspal deflections and marginal adaptation.
后牙复合树脂修复体已经使用了大约30年。早期使用这种治疗方法的经验表明,与汞合金修复体相比,它面临更多的临床挑战,失败率也更高。自后牙复合树脂问世以来,在材料、技术以及放置这些修复体的器械方面已经有了许多改进。本文回顾了后牙复合树脂修复体当前面临的临床挑战,并综述了收集临床性能数据的主要方法。本综述将这些挑战分为与修复材料相关的、与牙医相关的以及与患者相关的三类。从解决当前材料剩余临床挑战以及筛选新材料的角度讨论了实验室测试的临床相关性。与早期复合材料相关的临床问题已不再是严重的临床挑战。临床数据表明,继发龋和修复体折断是最常见的临床问题,值得进一步研究。牙医和患者对后牙复合树脂修复体性能的影响尚不清楚,需要更多来自假设驱动临床试验的临床数据来了解这些因素。应研究改善操作性能以确保无空隙放置和完全固化,从而改善临床效果。普遍缺乏将临床性能与实验室材料测试相关联的数据。本文提出了一份材料测试清单,这些测试可能预测复合材料在各种临床因素下的性能。文中回顾了聚合收缩以及归因于复合材料这一特性的问题。缺乏证据表明聚合收缩是继发龋的主要原因。建议开发具有抗菌性能的复合材料,以此减少继发龋导致的失败。术后敏感似乎更多地与牙本质粘结剂封闭开放牙本质小管的能力有关,而非聚合收缩对牙尖挠曲和边缘适应性的影响。