• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

将已知与新事物的回忆联系起来的纽带。

The ties that bind what is known to the recall of what is new.

作者信息

Nelson D L, Zhang N

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of South Florida, Tampa 33620-8200, USA.

出版信息

Psychon Bull Rev. 2000 Dec;7(4):604-17. doi: 10.3758/bf03212998.

DOI:10.3758/bf03212998
PMID:11206201
Abstract

Cued recall success varies with what people know and with what they do during an episode. This paper focuses on prior knowledge and disentangles the relative effects of 10 features of words and their relationships on cued recall. Results are reported for correlational and multiple regression analyses of data obtained from free association norms and from 29 experiments. The 10 features were only weakly correlated with each other in the norms and, with notable exceptions, in the experiments. The regression analysis indicated that forward cue-to-target strength explained the most variance, followed by backward target-to-cue strength. Target connectivity and set size explained the next most variance, along with mediated cue-to-target strength. Finally, frequency, concreteness, shared associate strength, and cue set size also contributed significantly to recall. Taken together, indices of prior word knowledge explain 49% of the recall variance. Theoretically driven equations that use free association to predict cued recall were also evaluated. Each equation was designed to condense multiple indices of word interconnectivity into a single predictor.

摘要

线索回忆的成功率会因人们在某一事件中的所知和所为而有所不同。本文聚焦于先验知识,并剖析了单词的10个特征及其关系对线索回忆的相对影响。报告了对从自由联想规范和29项实验中获得的数据进行相关分析和多元回归分析的结果。在规范中,以及在实验中(有显著例外情况),这10个特征之间的相关性都很弱。回归分析表明,正向线索到目标的强度解释的方差最多,其次是反向目标到线索的强度。目标连通性和集合大小解释的方差次之,中介线索到目标的强度也有类似情况。最后,频率、具体性、共享联想强度和线索集大小对回忆也有显著贡献。综合来看,先验单词知识的指标解释了49%的回忆方差。还评估了使用自由联想来预测线索回忆的理论驱动方程。每个方程旨在将单词相互连接性的多个指标浓缩为一个预测因子。

相似文献

1
The ties that bind what is known to the recall of what is new.将已知与新事物的回忆联系起来的纽带。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2000 Dec;7(4):604-17. doi: 10.3758/bf03212998.
2
One step is not enough: making better use of association norms to predict cued recall.
Mem Cognit. 1997 Nov;25(6):785-96. doi: 10.3758/bf03211322.
3
What is preexisting strength? Predicting free association probabilities, similarity ratings, and cued recall probabilities.什么是先前存在的强度?预测自由联想概率、相似性评级和线索回忆概率。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2005 Aug;12(4):711-9. doi: 10.3758/bf03196762.
4
How implicitly activated and explicitly acquired knowledge contribute to the effectiveness of retrieval cues.内隐激活知识和外显习得知识如何促进检索线索的有效性。
Mem Cognit. 2007 Dec;35(8):1892-904. doi: 10.3758/bf03192923.
5
Hypermnesia: the role of multiple retrieval cues.记忆增强:多重检索线索的作用。
Mem Cognit. 1999 Sep;27(5):928-34. doi: 10.3758/bf03198545.
6
Comparing word fragment completion and cued recall with letter cues.比较单词片段补全和字母线索提示下的线索回忆。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1987 Oct;13(4):542-52. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.13.4.542.
7
Are test-expectancy effects better explained by changes in encoding strategies or differential test experience?测试预期效应是否可以通过编码策略的改变或不同的测试经验来更好地解释?
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2021 Feb;47(2):195-207. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000949. Epub 2020 Sep 17.
8
Lexical and semantic search in cued recall, fragment completion, perceptual identification, and recognition.线索回忆、片段完成、知觉识别和再认中的词汇与语义搜索。
Am J Psychol. 1988 Winter;101(4):465-80.
9
Primacy and recency in primed free association and associative cued recall.启动自由联想和联想线索回忆中的首因效应和近因效应。
Psychon Bull Rev. 1999 Sep;6(3):479-85. doi: 10.3758/bf03210838.
10
Asymmetries in cue competition in forward and backward blocking designs: Further evidence for causal model theory.前向和后向阻断设计中线索竞争的不对称性:因果模型理论的进一步证据。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2007 Mar;60(3):387-99. doi: 10.1080/17470210601000839.

引用本文的文献

1
Semantic relatedness retroactively boosts memory and promotes memory interdependence across episodes.语义关联性会回溯性地增强记忆,并促进情节之间的记忆相互依赖。
Elife. 2022 Jun 15;11:e72519. doi: 10.7554/eLife.72519.
2
On Curiosity: A Fundamental Aspect of Personality, a Practice of Network Growth.论好奇心:人格的一个基本方面,一种网络成长的实践。
Personal Neurosci. 2018 Aug 10;1:e13. doi: 10.1017/pen.2018.3. eCollection 2018.
3
The role of sleep spindles and slow-wave activity in integrating new information in semantic memory.睡眠纺锤波和慢波活动在整合语义记忆中新信息中的作用。

本文引用的文献

1
Associative clustering during recall.
J Abnorm Psychol. 1952 Oct;47(4):818-21. doi: 10.1037/h0063149.
2
Dissociated backward priming effects in lexical decision and pronunciation tasks.词汇判断和发音任务中的分离性逆向启动效应。
Psychon Bull Rev. 1999 Mar;6(1):105-10. doi: 10.3758/bf03210816.
3
What is free association and what does it measure?什么是自由联想,它衡量的是什么?
Mem Cognit. 2000 Sep;28(6):887-99. doi: 10.3758/bf03209337.
J Neurosci. 2013 Sep 25;33(39):15376-81. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5093-12.2013.
4
Metacognitive monitoring and dementia: how intrinsic and extrinsic cues influence judgments of learning in people with early-stage Alzheimer's disease.元认知监测与痴呆:内在和外在线索如何影响早期阿尔茨海默病患者的学习判断。
Neuropsychology. 2013 Jul;27(4):452-63. doi: 10.1037/a0033050.
5
How activation, entanglement, and searching a semantic network contribute to event memory.激活、纠缠和搜索语义网络如何促进事件记忆。
Mem Cognit. 2013 Aug;41(6):797-819. doi: 10.3758/s13421-013-0312-y.
6
The influence of the phonological neighborhood clustering coefficient on spoken word recognition.音系近邻聚类系数对口语词汇识别的影响。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2009 Dec;35(6):1934-49. doi: 10.1037/a0016902.
7
Scale-invariant transition probabilities in free word association trajectories.自由联想轨迹中的标度不变跃迁概率。
Front Integr Neurosci. 2009 Sep 11;3:19. doi: 10.3389/neuro.07.019.2009. eCollection 2009.
8
The effect of semantic set size on word learning by preschool children.语义集大小对学龄前儿童单词学习的影响。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2009 Apr;52(2):306-20. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2009/07-0175). Epub 2009 Feb 27.
9
Adult and child semantic neighbors of the Kroll and Potter (1984) nonobjects.克罗尔和波特(1984年)非物体的成人及儿童语义邻接词。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2009 Apr;52(2):289-305. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2009/07-0174). Epub 2009 Feb 27.
10
Developmental differences in the effects of phonological, lexical and semantic variables on word learning by infants.语音、词汇和语义变量对婴儿单词学习影响的发展差异。
J Child Lang. 2009 Mar;36(2):291-321. doi: 10.1017/S030500090800891X. Epub 2008 Sep 2.
4
What is this thing called frequency?
Mem Cognit. 2000 Jun;28(4):509-22. doi: 10.3758/bf03201241.
5
What is the connection between true and false memories? The differential roles of interitem associations in recall and recognition.真假记忆之间的联系是什么?项目间关联在回忆和识别中的不同作用。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1999 Sep;25(5):1177-94. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.25.5.1177.
6
Cue set size effects: sampling activated associates or cross-target interference?
Mem Cognit. 1999 May;27(3):465-77. doi: 10.3758/bf03211541.
7
Interpreting the influence of implicitly activated memories on recall and recognition.解读内隐激活记忆对回忆和识别的影响。
Psychol Rev. 1998 Apr;105(2):299-324. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.105.2.299.
8
One step is not enough: making better use of association norms to predict cued recall.
Mem Cognit. 1997 Nov;25(6):785-96. doi: 10.3758/bf03211322.
9
Implicit memory: effects of network size and interconnectivity on cued recall.内隐记忆:网络规模和互连性对线索回忆的影响。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1993 Jul;19(4):747-64. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.19.4.747.
10
On the status of inhibitory mechanisms in cognition: memory retrieval as a model case.论认知中的抑制机制:以记忆提取为例
Psychol Rev. 1995 Jan;102(1):68-100. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.102.1.68.