Zurn Perry, Bassett Danielle S
Center for Curiosity, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Department of Philosophy, American University, Washington, DC, USA.
Personal Neurosci. 2018 Aug 10;1:e13. doi: 10.1017/pen.2018.3. eCollection 2018.
Human personality is reflected in patterns-or -of behavior, either in thought or action. Curiosity is an oft-treasured component of one's personality, commonly associated with information-seeking proclivities with distinct neurophysiological correlates. The markers of curiosity can differ substantially across people, suggesting the possibility that personality also determines the architectural style of one's curiosity. Yet progress in defining those styles, and marking their neurophysiological basis, has been hampered by fairly fundamental difficulties in defining curiosity itself. Here, we offer and exercise a definition of the practice of curiosity as knowledge network building, one particular pattern of thought behavior. To unpack this definition and motivate its utility, we begin with a short primer on network science and describe how the mathematical object of a network can be used to map items and relations that are characteristic of bodies of knowledge. Next, we turn to a discussion of how networks grow, how their growth can be modeled, and how the practice of curiosity can be formalized as a process of network growth. We pay particular attention to how individuals may differ in how they build their knowledge networks, and discuss how the sort, manner, and action of building can be modulated by experience. We discuss how this definition of the practice of curiosity motivates new experiments and theory development at the interdisciplinary intersection of network science, personality neuroscience, education, and curiosity studies. We close with a note on the potential of network science to inform studies of other domains of personality, and the patterns of thought- or action-behavior characteristic thereof.
人的个性体现在行为模式中,无论是在思维还是行动上。好奇心是一个人个性中经常被珍视的组成部分,通常与寻求信息的倾向相关,有着独特的神经生理关联。不同人之间好奇心的标志可能有很大差异,这表明个性也可能决定一个人好奇心的架构风格。然而,在定义这些风格并确定其神经生理基础方面的进展,一直受到定义好奇心本身这一相当基本的困难的阻碍。在这里,我们提出并运用一种将好奇心的实践定义为知识网络构建的定义,这是一种特定的思维行为模式。为了解开这个定义并说明其效用,我们首先对网络科学进行一个简短的入门介绍,并描述网络这个数学对象如何能够用来映射知识体系所特有的项目和关系。接下来,我们转向讨论网络如何增长、如何对其增长进行建模,以及好奇心的实践如何可以被形式化为一个网络增长的过程。我们特别关注个体在构建他们的知识网络时可能存在的差异,并讨论构建的种类、方式和行动如何可以被经验所调节。我们讨论好奇心实践的这个定义如何在网络科学、个性神经科学、教育和好奇心研究的跨学科交叉点上推动新的实验和理论发展。我们最后指出网络科学在为个性的其他领域的研究提供信息以及揭示其特有的思维或行动行为模式方面的潜力。