• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

内隐记忆:网络规模和互连性对线索回忆的影响。

Implicit memory: effects of network size and interconnectivity on cued recall.

作者信息

Nelson D L, Bennett D J, Gee N R, Schreiber T A, McKinney V M

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of South Florida, Tampa 33620.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1993 Jul;19(4):747-64. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.19.4.747.

DOI:10.1037//0278-7393.19.4.747
PMID:8345322
Abstract

Previous findings have indicated that the recall of a recently studied word is affected by how many associates it has in long-term memory (set size). The purpose of these experiments was to determine whether recall is also affected by the connectivity of these associates. Studied words were preselected to represent combinations of set size and connectivity and, in different experiments, recall was cued with extralist or intralist cues and with cues sharing few or many associates with the studied words. Effects of study time, encoding context, and levels of processing were also investigated. The results indicated that recall was more likely for words with smaller associative sets and for words with more interconnected sets of associates. These findings demonstrate that the recall of a recently presented word in the presence of a retrieval cue is affected by both the size and organization of its implicitly activated associative structure.

摘要

先前的研究结果表明,对最近学习的单词的回忆会受到其在长期记忆中的关联数量(集合大小)的影响。这些实验的目的是确定回忆是否也会受到这些关联的连通性的影响。预先选择被研究的单词以代表集合大小和连通性的组合,并且在不同的实验中,用列表外或列表内线索以及与被研究单词共享很少或很多关联的线索来提示回忆。还研究了学习时间、编码上下文和加工水平的影响。结果表明,对于具有较小关联集的单词和具有更多相互连接的关联集的单词,回忆的可能性更大。这些发现表明,在存在检索线索的情况下,对最近呈现的单词的回忆会受到其隐式激活的关联结构的大小和组织的影响。

相似文献

1
Implicit memory: effects of network size and interconnectivity on cued recall.内隐记忆:网络规模和互连性对线索回忆的影响。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1993 Jul;19(4):747-64. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.19.4.747.
2
Selective access in cued recall: the roles of retrieval cues and domains of encoding.线索回忆中的选择性提取:提取线索与编码领域的作用。
Mem Cognit. 1990 Jan;18(1):15-22. doi: 10.3758/bf03202641.
3
Comparing word fragment completion and cued recall with letter cues.比较单词片段补全和字母线索提示下的线索回忆。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1987 Oct;13(4):542-52. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.13.4.542.
4
Encoding context and retrieval conditions as determinants of the effects of natural category size.编码情境和检索条件作为自然类别大小效应的决定因素。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1990 Jan;16(1):31-41. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.16.1.31.
5
How activation, entanglement, and searching a semantic network contribute to event memory.激活、纠缠和搜索语义网络如何促进事件记忆。
Mem Cognit. 2013 Aug;41(6):797-819. doi: 10.3758/s13421-013-0312-y.
6
Implicit processing in the cued recall of young and old adults.年轻人和老年人线索回忆中的内隐加工。
Psychol Aging. 1992 Sep;7(3):401-8. doi: 10.1037//0882-7974.7.3.401.
7
Prior knowledge: the effects of natural category size on memory for implicitly encoded concepts.先验知识:自然类别大小对隐性编码概念记忆的影响。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1989 Sep;15(5):957-67. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.15.5.957.
8
Prior knowledge and cued recall: category size and dominance.先验知识与线索回忆:类别大小与主导性
Am J Psychol. 1985 Winter;98(4):503-17.
9
Lexical and semantic search in cued recall, fragment completion, perceptual identification, and recognition.线索回忆、片段完成、知觉识别和再认中的词汇与语义搜索。
Am J Psychol. 1988 Winter;101(4):465-80.
10
How does delayed testing reduce effects of implicit memory: context infusion or cuing with context?
Mem Cognit. 2007 Jul;35(5):1014-23. doi: 10.3758/bf03193474.

引用本文的文献

1
Characterization of language abilities and semantic networks in very preterm children at school-age.学龄期极早产儿语言能力和语义网络的特征分析。
PLoS One. 2025 Jan 29;20(1):e0317535. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0317535. eCollection 2025.
2
Structural differences in the semantic networks of younger and older adults.年轻人和老年人语义网络的结构差异。
Sci Rep. 2022 Dec 12;12(1):21459. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-11698-4.
3
Using Network Science to Understand the Aging Lexicon: Linking Individuals' Experience, Semantic Networks, and Cognitive Performance.
利用网络科学理解衰老词汇:将个体经验、语义网络和认知表现联系起来。
Top Cogn Sci. 2022 Jan;14(1):93-110. doi: 10.1111/tops.12586. Epub 2022 Jan 18.
4
Quantifying flexibility in thought: The resiliency of semantic networks differs across the lifespan.量化思维灵活性:语义网络的弹性在整个生命周期中有所不同。
Cognition. 2021 Jun;211:104631. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104631. Epub 2021 Feb 24.
5
Evidence for preferential attachment: Words that are more well connected in semantic networks are better at acquiring new links in paired-associate learning.证据表明优先连接:在语义网络中连接更好的词在联想学习中更容易获得新的连接。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2020 Oct;27(5):1059-1069. doi: 10.3758/s13423-020-01773-0.
6
The effect of word imagery on priming effect under a preconscious condition: an fMRI study.前意识条件下词语意象对启动效应的影响:一项功能磁共振成像研究
Hum Brain Mapp. 2014 Sep;35(9):4795-804. doi: 10.1002/hbm.22512. Epub 2014 Apr 1.
7
How activation, entanglement, and searching a semantic network contribute to event memory.激活、纠缠和搜索语义网络如何促进事件记忆。
Mem Cognit. 2013 Aug;41(6):797-819. doi: 10.3758/s13421-013-0312-y.
8
Simulating retrieval from a highly clustered network: implications for spoken word recognition.模拟从高度聚类网络中检索:对口语单词识别的影响。
Front Psychol. 2011 Dec 14;2:369. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00369. eCollection 2011.
9
The influence of the phonological neighborhood clustering coefficient on spoken word recognition.音系近邻聚类系数对口语词汇识别的影响。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2009 Dec;35(6):1934-49. doi: 10.1037/a0016902.
10
Neuroimaging of semantic processing in schizophrenia: a parametric priming approach.精神分裂症语义处理的神经影像学:参数启动方法。
Int J Psychophysiol. 2010 Feb;75(2):100-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2009.09.004. Epub 2009 Sep 15.