• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

群体干预与行为医学的局限性。

Group interventions and the limits of behavioral medicine.

作者信息

Dooley D, Catalano R

机构信息

Department of Psychology and Social Behavior, School of Social Ecology, University of California, Irvine, USA.

出版信息

Behav Med. 2000 Fall;26(3):116-28. doi: 10.1080/08964280009595759.

DOI:10.1080/08964280009595759
PMID:11209592
Abstract

A wide range of interventions has been devised to address health hazards in the social and physical environment. The authors propose a 2-dimensional matrix to organize these interventions. The timing of interventions is divided into 4 stages: preventing exposure to hazard (proactive primary prevention), preventing symptoms from appearing (reactive primary prevention), preventing early symptoms from becoming chronic or leading to disease (secondary prevention), and managing the disease (tertiary prevention). The level at which the intervention is targeted is divided into 2 categories: micro (individual or family) and macro (more aggregate social level). Large-scale interventions such as media campaigns can target either individual health behaviors (microlevel) or the environment (macrolevel). This typology is illustrated with interventions designed to prevent or ameliorate the health consequences of adverse employment changes such as job loss. The analysis concludes that behavioral medicine and public health approaches are differentially suited to different intervention types.

摘要

人们已经设计出了各种各样的干预措施来应对社会和自然环境中的健康危害。作者提出了一个二维矩阵来组织这些干预措施。干预的时机分为4个阶段:预防接触危害(积极的一级预防)、预防症状出现(反应性一级预防)、预防早期症状发展为慢性病或导致疾病(二级预防)以及管理疾病(三级预防)。干预的目标层面分为两类:微观(个人或家庭)和宏观(更综合的社会层面)。诸如媒体宣传活动等大规模干预措施可以针对个人健康行为(微观层面)或环境(宏观层面)。这种类型学通过旨在预防或改善诸如失业等不良就业变化对健康造成的后果的干预措施进行了说明。分析得出结论,行为医学和公共卫生方法分别适用于不同类型的干预措施。

相似文献

1
Group interventions and the limits of behavioral medicine.群体干预与行为医学的局限性。
Behav Med. 2000 Fall;26(3):116-28. doi: 10.1080/08964280009595759.
2
The future of health psychology interventions.健康心理学干预的未来。
Health Psychol. 2004 Mar;23(2):132-7. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.23.2.132.
3
Reducing obesity and related chronic disease risk in children and youth: a synthesis of evidence with 'best practice' recommendations.降低儿童和青少年肥胖及相关慢性病风险:证据综合与“最佳实践”建议
Obes Rev. 2006 Feb;7 Suppl 1:7-66. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2006.00242.x.
4
Behavioral research in HIV/AIDS primary and secondary prevention: recent advances and future directions.艾滋病毒/艾滋病一级和二级预防中的行为研究:最新进展与未来方向
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2002 Jun;70(3):626-39.
5
Physical activity and diabetes: opportunities for prevention through policy.身体活动与糖尿病:通过政策进行预防的机遇
Phys Ther. 2008 Nov;88(11):1425-35. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20080031. Epub 2008 Sep 18.
6
Health promotion model for childhood violence prevention and exposure.预防儿童暴力及接触暴力的健康促进模式。
J Clin Nurs. 2007 Jan;16(1):38-45. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01621.x.
7
Social ecology and behavioral medicine: implications for training, practice, and policy.社会生态学与行为医学:对培训、实践及政策的影响。
Behav Med. 2000 Fall;26(3):129-38. doi: 10.1080/08964280009595760.
8
The limits of prevention.预防的局限性。
Public Health Rep. 1985 May-Jun;100(3):255-60.
9
Behavioral health: Treatment and prevention of chronic disease and the implications for social work practice.行为健康:慢性病的治疗与预防及其对社会工作实践的影响。
J Health Soc Policy. 2003;17(2):49-65. doi: 10.1300/J045v17n02_03.
10
Bridging prevention and practice: public health and family violence.连接预防与实践:公共卫生与家庭暴力
Acad Med. 1997 Jan;72(1 Suppl):S13-8.

引用本文的文献

1
The role of financial hardship, mastery and social support in the association between employment status and depression: results from an Australian longitudinal cohort study.经济困难、掌控感和社会支持在就业状况与抑郁之间关联中的作用:一项澳大利亚纵向队列研究的结果
BMJ Open. 2016 May 27;6(5):e009834. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009834.