Suppr超能文献

加速度计能否准确预测上坡/下坡行走的能量消耗?

Can accelerometry accurately predict the energy cost of uphill/downhill walking?

作者信息

Terrier P, Aminian K, Schutz Y

机构信息

Institute of Physiology, Lausanne University, Switzerland.

出版信息

Ergonomics. 2001 Jan 15;44(1):48-62. doi: 10.1080/00140130118289.

Abstract

To evaluate whether an activity monitor based on body acceleration measurement can accurately assess the energy cost of the human locomotion, 12 subjects walked a combination of three different speeds (preferred speed +/- 1 km/h) and seven slopes (-15 to +15% by steps of 5%) on a treadmill. Body accelerations were recorded using a triaxial accelerometer attached to the low back. The mean of the integral of the vector magnitude (norm) of the accelerations (mIAN) was calculated. VO2 was measured using continuous indirect calorimetry. When the results were separately analysed for each incline, mIAN was correlated to VO2 (average r = 0.87, p<0.001, n = 36). VO2 was not significantly correlated to mIAN when data were globally analysed (n = 252). Large relative errors occurred when predicted VO2 (estimated from data of level walking) was compared with measured VO2 for different inclines (-53% at +15% incline, to +55% at -15% incline). It is concluded that without an external measurement of the slope, the standard method of analysis of body accelerations cannot accurately predict the energy cost of uphill or downhill walking.

摘要

为评估基于身体加速度测量的活动监测器能否准确评估人类运动的能量消耗,12名受试者在跑步机上以三种不同速度(偏好速度±1公里/小时)和七种坡度(-15%至+15%,步长为5%)的组合进行行走。使用附着在腰部的三轴加速度计记录身体加速度。计算加速度矢量大小(范数)积分的平均值(mIAN)。使用连续间接量热法测量VO2。当对每个坡度分别分析结果时,mIAN与VO2相关(平均r = 0.87,p<0.001,n = 36)。当对数据进行整体分析时(n = 252),VO2与mIAN无显著相关性。当将不同坡度下预测的VO2(根据水平行走数据估算)与测量的VO2进行比较时,出现了较大的相对误差(在+15%坡度时为-53%,在-15%坡度时为+55%)。得出的结论是,在没有外部坡度测量的情况下,身体加速度的标准分析方法无法准确预测上坡或下坡行走的能量消耗。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验