Kahrilas P J
Department of Medicine, Northwestern University Medical School, Chicago, IL 60611, USA.
Semin Gastrointest Dis. 2001 Jan;12(1):3-15.
Both laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication and proton pump inhibitors are effective modern therapies for reflux disease that have yet to be directly compared in a well-designed clinical trial. In terms of a risk/benefit analysis, the risk of an undesirable outcome or death from laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication exceeds that of maintenance treatment with proton pump inhibitors making the later the preferable therapy. Neither therapy increases or reduces the risk of death from cancer and there are no compelling economic arguments favoring surgical management. Instances in which laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication should be considered include: 1) Individuals who are intolerant of proton pump inhibitor therapy because of side effects, 2) When patients are inadequately responsive to proton pump inhibitor therapy even after dosage and dose interval have been optimized, and 3) When a patient desires a permanent solution to their reflux problem that frees them of the need to chronically consume pharmaceuticals. However, regardless of the motivation for pursuing surgical management, patients must be advised of potential suboptimal results and the irreversibility of the procedure.
腹腔镜尼氏胃底折叠术和质子泵抑制剂都是治疗反流性疾病的有效现代疗法,但尚未在精心设计的临床试验中进行直接比较。从风险/效益分析来看,腹腔镜尼氏胃底折叠术导致不良后果或死亡的风险超过质子泵抑制剂维持治疗,因此后者是更可取的治疗方法。两种治疗方法都不会增加或降低癌症死亡风险,也没有令人信服的经济论据支持手术治疗。应考虑进行腹腔镜尼氏胃底折叠术的情况包括:1)因副作用而不耐受质子泵抑制剂治疗的个体;2)即使在优化剂量和给药间隔后,患者对质子泵抑制剂治疗反应不佳;3)患者希望永久性解决反流问题,从而无需长期服用药物。然而,无论进行手术治疗的动机如何,都必须告知患者可能出现的不理想结果以及手术的不可逆性。