• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项比较质子泵抑制与手术治疗反流性食管炎的随机临床试验的七年随访

Seven-year follow-up of a randomized clinical trial comparing proton-pump inhibition with surgical therapy for reflux oesophagitis.

作者信息

Lundell L, Miettinen P, Myrvold H E, Hatlebakk J G, Wallin L, Malm A, Sutherland I, Walan A

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

Br J Surg. 2007 Feb;94(2):198-203. doi: 10.1002/bjs.5492.

DOI:10.1002/bjs.5492
PMID:17256807
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This randomized clinical trial compared long-term outcome after antireflux surgery with acid inhibition therapy in the treatment of chronic gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD).

METHODS

Patients with chronic GORD and oesophagitis verified at endoscopy were allocated to treatment with omeprazole (154 patients) or antireflux surgery (144). After 7 years of follow-up, 119 patients in the omeprazole arm and 99 who had antireflux surgery were available for evaluation. The primary outcome variable was the cumulative proportion of patients in whom treatment failed. Secondary objectives were evaluation of the treatment failure rate after dose adjustment of omeprazole, safety, and the frequency and severity of post-fundoplication complaints.

RESULTS

The proportion of patients in whom treatment did not fail during the 7 years was significantly higher in the surgical than in the medical group (66.7 versus 46.7 per cent respectively; P=0.002). A smaller difference remained after dose adjustment in the omeprazole group (P=0.045). More patients in the surgical group complained of symptoms such as dysphagia, inability to belch or vomit, and rectal flatulence. These complaints were fairly stable throughout the study interval. The mean daily dose of omeprazole was 22.8, 24.1, 24.3 and 24.3 mg at 1, 3, 5 and 7 years respectively.

CONCLUSION

Chronic GORD can be treated effectively by either antireflux surgery or omeprazole therapy. After 7 years, surgery was more effective in controlling overall disease symptoms, but specific post-fundoplication complaints remained a problem. There appeared to be no dose escalation of omeprazole with time.

摘要

背景

这项随机临床试验比较了抗反流手术与抑酸治疗在慢性胃食管反流病(GORD)治疗中的长期疗效。

方法

经内镜检查确诊为慢性GORD和食管炎的患者被分配接受奥美拉唑治疗(154例患者)或抗反流手术(144例)。经过7年的随访,奥美拉唑组有119例患者和接受抗反流手术的99例患者可供评估。主要结局变量是治疗失败患者的累积比例。次要目标是评估奥美拉唑剂量调整后的治疗失败率、安全性以及胃底折叠术后不适的频率和严重程度。

结果

手术组7年内治疗未失败的患者比例显著高于药物组(分别为66.7%和46.7%;P = 0.002)。奥美拉唑组剂量调整后差异较小(P = 0.045)。手术组更多患者抱怨有吞咽困难、无法嗳气或呕吐以及直肠胀气等症状。在整个研究期间,这些不适相当稳定。奥美拉唑的平均每日剂量在1年、3年、5年和7年分别为22.8、24.1、24.3和24.3毫克。

结论

抗反流手术或奥美拉唑治疗均可有效治疗慢性GORD。7年后,手术在控制总体疾病症状方面更有效,但胃底折叠术后的特定不适仍然是个问题。奥美拉唑似乎未随时间增加剂量。

相似文献

1
Seven-year follow-up of a randomized clinical trial comparing proton-pump inhibition with surgical therapy for reflux oesophagitis.一项比较质子泵抑制与手术治疗反流性食管炎的随机临床试验的七年随访
Br J Surg. 2007 Feb;94(2):198-203. doi: 10.1002/bjs.5492.
2
Comparison of outcomes twelve years after antireflux surgery or omeprazole maintenance therapy for reflux esophagitis.反流性食管炎抗反流手术与奥美拉唑维持治疗 12 年后结局比较
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009 Dec;7(12):1292-8; quiz 1260. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2009.05.021. Epub 2009 May 31.
3
Asthmatics with gastroesophageal reflux: long term results of a randomized trial of medical and surgical antireflux therapies.患有胃食管反流的哮喘患者:药物和手术抗反流治疗随机试验的长期结果
Am J Gastroenterol. 2003 May;98(5):987-99. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2003.07503.x.
4
Management of GERD: medical versus surgical.胃食管反流病的管理:药物治疗与手术治疗对比
Semin Gastrointest Dis. 2001 Jan;12(1):3-15.
5
Long-term outcome of Nissen fundoplication in non-erosive and erosive gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.非糜烂性和糜烂性胃食管反流病患者行 Nissen 胃底折叠术的长期疗效。
Br J Surg. 2010 Jun;97(6):845-52. doi: 10.1002/bjs.7023.
6
Relationship between symptom response and oesophageal acid exposure after medical and surgical treatment for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.胃食管反流病药物及手术治疗后症状反应与食管酸暴露之间的关系
Br J Surg. 2004 Nov;91(11):1460-5. doi: 10.1002/bjs.4614.
7
Outcome of open antireflux surgery as assessed in a Nordic multicentre prospective clinical trial. Nordic GORD-Study Group.在一项北欧多中心前瞻性临床试验中评估的开放抗反流手术结果。北欧胃食管反流病研究组
Eur J Surg. 1998 Oct;164(10):751-7. doi: 10.1080/110241598750005381.
8
Monitoring of omeprazole treatment in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.胃食管反流病中奥美拉唑治疗的监测
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1996 May;8(5):417-20.
9
Oesophageal acid hypersensitivity is not a contraindication to Nissen fundoplication.食管酸高敏反应并非尼氏胃底折叠术的禁忌证。
Br J Surg. 2009 Sep;96(9):1023-30. doi: 10.1002/bjs.6684.
10
Natural history of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease without oesophagitis (NERD)--a reappraisal 10 years on.无食管炎的胃食管反流病(NERD)的自然史——10年后的重新评估
Dig Liver Dis. 2004 Feb;36(2):111-5. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2003.10.012.

引用本文的文献

1
Successful Lifetime/Long-Term Medical Treatment of Acid Hypersecretion in Zollinger-Ellison Syndrome (ZES): Myth or Fact? Insights from an Analysis of Results of NIH Long-Term Prospective Studies of ZES.卓-艾综合征(ZES)胃酸分泌过多的终身/长期成功医学治疗:神话还是现实?来自美国国立卫生研究院ZES长期前瞻性研究结果分析的见解
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Feb 21;15(5):1377. doi: 10.3390/cancers15051377.
2
Hiatal hernia repair with transoral incisionless fundoplication versus Nissen fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease: A retrospective study.经口无切口胃底折叠术与Nissen胃底折叠术治疗胃食管反流病的食管裂孔疝修补术:一项回顾性研究。
Endosc Int Open. 2023 Jan 4;11(1):E11-E18. doi: 10.1055/a-1972-9190. eCollection 2023 Jan.
3
Ancillary treatment of patients with lung disease due to non-tuberculous mycobacteria: a narrative review.
非结核分枝杆菌所致肺部疾病患者的辅助治疗:一项叙述性综述
J Thorac Dis. 2022 Sep;14(9):3575-3597. doi: 10.21037/jtd-22-410.
4
2020 Seoul Consensus on the Diagnosis and Management of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.《2020年胃食管反流病诊断与管理首尔共识》
J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2021 Oct 30;27(4):453-481. doi: 10.5056/jnm21077.
5
Surgical treatment of GERD: systematic review and meta-analysis.胃食管反流病的手术治疗:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Aug;35(8):4095-4123. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08358-5. Epub 2021 Mar 2.
6
Fundoplication versus oral proton pump inhibitors for gastroesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.胃食管反流病的胃底折叠术与口服质子泵抑制剂治疗:随机临床试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Esophagus. 2021 Apr;18(2):173-180. doi: 10.1007/s10388-020-00806-w. Epub 2021 Feb 2.
7
Evidence-Based Practice Guideline for Surgical Treatment of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease 2018.《2018年胃食管反流病手术治疗循证实践指南》
J Gastric Cancer. 2018 Dec;18(4):313-327. doi: 10.5230/jgc.2018.18.e41. Epub 2018 Dec 27.
8
A Novel, Dynamic Statistical Model for Predicting Patient Satisfaction with Fundoplication Based on Pre-Operative Symptom Patterns.一种基于术前症状模式预测患者对胃底折叠术满意度的新型动态统计模型。
World J Surg. 2017 Nov;41(11):2778-2787. doi: 10.1007/s00268-017-4057-9.
9
Factors predicting outcomes of laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease: experience at a single institution in Korea.预测腹腔镜下尼氏胃底折叠术治疗胃食管反流病疗效的因素:韩国一家机构的经验
Ann Surg Treat Res. 2017 Apr;92(4):184-190. doi: 10.4174/astr.2017.92.4.184. Epub 2017 Mar 24.
10
[Surgical and interventional procedures for reflux therapy : Endoscopic or laparoscopic?].[反流治疗的外科手术和介入手术:内镜手术还是腹腔镜手术?]
Chirurg. 2017 Mar;88(3):188-195. doi: 10.1007/s00104-017-0369-4.