McGuire L C, Munro P T
Department of Accident & Emergency Medicine, John Radcliffe Hospital, Headley Way, Headington, Oxford.
Scott Med J. 2000 Dec;45(6):169-70. doi: 10.1177/003693300004500603.
Our objective was to describe current use of Munchausen files in Scottish Accident and Emergency Departments. A Postal questionnaire survey was sent to lead A&E consultant/clinical directors in each department in Summer 1998. A total of 29 departments replied with 27 saying they kept a Munchausen file, of which only two were updated regularly. Organisation of information was variable or absent. Six departments kept data on other groups such as drug misusers, violent patients, missing persons or children at risk in the same file. Of the 27 replies, only 14 departments would review their own files if suspecting a case; only 11 would report a suspected incident, to a variety of destinations. The majority of Scottish A&E departments do keep a Munchausen file although there appears to be little consistency in the collection, use and dissemination of the information therein. An improved data system may lead to more appropriate patient management.
我们的目的是描述苏格兰急诊部门目前对孟乔森综合征档案的使用情况。1998年夏季,我们向每个部门的急诊首席顾问/临床主任发送了一份邮政问卷调查。共有29个部门回复,其中27个表示他们保存了孟乔森综合征档案,但只有两个会定期更新。信息的组织方式各不相同或根本没有。六个部门在同一档案中保存了关于其他群体的数据,如药物滥用者、暴力患者、失踪人员或处于危险中的儿童。在27份回复中,只有14个部门在怀疑有病例时会查阅自己的档案;只有11个部门会向不同的对象报告疑似事件。苏格兰大多数急诊部门确实保存了孟乔森综合征档案,尽管其中信息的收集、使用和传播似乎缺乏一致性。改进数据系统可能会带来更恰当的患者管理。