• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用户对姑息治疗服务的看法:伦理影响

Users' views on palliative care services: ethical implications.

作者信息

Woods S, Beaver K, Luker K

机构信息

Institute of Medicine, Law and Bioethics, University of Manchester, Williamson Building, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PT, UK.

出版信息

Nurs Ethics. 2000 Jul;7(4):314-26. doi: 10.1177/096973300000700405.

DOI:10.1177/096973300000700405
PMID:11221408
Abstract

This article is based on the findings of a study that elicited the views of terminally ill patients (n = 15), their carers (n = 10) and bereaved carers (n = 19) on the palliative care services they received. It explores the range of ethical issues revealed by the data. Although the focus of the original study was on community services, the participants frequently commented on all aspects of their experience. They described some of its positive and negative aspects. Of concern was the reported lack of sensitivity to the role of the family among health professionals. The family, as carers, service users and advocates, represent a challenge to professional boundaries and the ethical norms of confidentiality and best interest. The accounts reveal the complexity of the ethical issues that characterize terminal care, issuing specific ethical challenges to nurses and other health professionals involved in this field.

摘要

本文基于一项研究的结果,该研究征集了晚期患者(n = 15)、他们的护理人员(n = 10)以及丧亲护理人员(n = 19)对他们所接受的姑息治疗服务的看法。它探讨了数据所揭示的一系列伦理问题。尽管原研究的重点是社区服务,但参与者经常对他们经历的各个方面发表评论。他们描述了其中的一些积极和消极方面。令人担忧的是,据报告卫生专业人员对家庭角色缺乏敏感性。家庭作为护理人员、服务使用者和倡导者,对专业界限以及保密和最大利益的伦理规范构成了挑战。这些叙述揭示了临终护理中伦理问题的复杂性,给该领域的护士和其他卫生专业人员带来了特定的伦理挑战。

相似文献

1
Users' views on palliative care services: ethical implications.用户对姑息治疗服务的看法:伦理影响
Nurs Ethics. 2000 Jul;7(4):314-26. doi: 10.1177/096973300000700405.
2
Unraveling ethical issues in palliative care.揭示姑息治疗中的伦理问题。
Semin Oncol Nurs. 1998 May;14(2):137-44. doi: 10.1016/s0749-2081(98)80019-3.
3
End-of-life care: A qualitative study comparing the views of people with dementia and family carers.终末期照护:一项比较痴呆症患者和家庭照顾者观点的定性研究。
Palliat Med. 2018 Mar;32(3):631-642. doi: 10.1177/0269216317736033. Epub 2017 Oct 12.
4
Palliative care services for people with dementia: a synthesis of the literature reporting the views and experiences of professionals and family carers.为痴呆症患者提供的姑息治疗服务:综合报道专业人员和家庭护理人员观点及经验的文献
Dementia (London). 2014 Jan;13(1):96-110. doi: 10.1177/1471301212450538. Epub 2012 Aug 10.
5
Service user perspectives on palliative care education for health and social care professionals supporting people with learning disabilities.服务使用者对为支持学习障碍人士的健康和社会护理专业人员开展姑息治疗教育的看法。
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2015 Dec;5(5):531-7. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2013-000615. Epub 2014 Mar 4.
6
The experience of palliative care service provision for people with non-malignant respiratory disease and their family carers: An all-Ireland qualitative study.非恶性呼吸道疾病患者及其家庭照顾者的姑息治疗服务体验:全爱尔兰定性研究。
J Adv Nurs. 2018 Feb;74(2):383-394. doi: 10.1111/jan.13453. Epub 2017 Nov 27.
7
Developing organisational ethics in palliative care.在姑息治疗中发展组织伦理。
Nurs Ethics. 2017 Mar;24(2):138-150. doi: 10.1177/0969733015595542. Epub 2016 Aug 3.
8
Healthcare users' experiences of communicating with healthcare professionals about children who have life-limiting conditions: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医疗保健使用者就患有危及生命疾病的儿童与医疗保健专业人员沟通的经历:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Nov;13(11):33-42. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2413.
9
Public, patient and carers' views on palliative and end-of-life care in India.公众、患者和照护者对印度姑息治疗和临终关怀的看法。
Int Nurs Rev. 2018 Jun;65(2):292-301. doi: 10.1111/inr.12403. Epub 2017 Aug 30.
10
On withholding artificial hydration and nutrition from terminally ill sedated patients. The debate continues.关于对处于终末期且已接受镇静治疗的患者停止人工补液和营养支持。争论仍在继续。
J Med Ethics. 1996 Jun;22(3):147-53. doi: 10.1136/jme.22.3.147.

引用本文的文献

1
Defining ethical challenge(s) in healthcare research: a rapid review.定义医疗保健研究中的伦理挑战:快速综述。
BMC Med Ethics. 2021 Sep 29;22(1):135. doi: 10.1186/s12910-021-00700-9.
2
Real-world ethics in palliative care: A systematic review of the ethical challenges reported by specialist palliative care practitioners in their clinical practice.姑息治疗中的现实世界伦理:对姑息治疗专科从业者在临床实践中报告的伦理挑战的系统评价。
Palliat Med. 2021 Feb;35(2):315-334. doi: 10.1177/0269216320974277. Epub 2020 Dec 10.
3
Relational autonomy in end-of-life care ethics: a contextualized approach to real-life complexities.
临终关怀伦理中的关系自主性:一种应对现实生活复杂性的情境化方法。
BMC Med Ethics. 2020 Jun 30;21(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s12910-020-00495-1.
4
Key challenges and ways forward in researching the "good death": qualitative in-depth interview and focus group study.研究“善终”的关键挑战与未来方向:定性深入访谈和焦点小组研究
BMJ. 2007 Mar 10;334(7592):521. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39097.582639.55. Epub 2007 Feb 28.
5
Hospice at home service: the carer's perspective.居家临终关怀服务:护工的视角
Support Care Cancer. 2007 Feb;15(2):163-70. doi: 10.1007/s00520-006-0110-1. Epub 2006 Aug 30.