[The validity of the Hornheide questionnaire for psychosocial support in skin tumor patients: a survey in an Austrian and German outpatient population with melanoma].

Tumour patients are subject to different degrees of psychosocial distress depending on the course of disease, personality variables and amount of social support available. Often patients do not spontaneously talk about their distress and attending physicians fail to detect it. Therefore, it is important that the presence of distress is ascertained by specific screening instruments so that appropriate supportive measures can be instituted. The Hornheide Questionnaire (HQ) employed for investigating the need for psychosocial support in the case of patients with skin tumours and with tumours in the head and neck region represents such a specific screening instrument. The present study investigates the validity of the HQ on the basis of two representative samples from two different University Clinics for treatment and follow-ups of melanoma patients. With the help of the HQ, 215 patients at the Dermatology Out-patient Unit of the University of Innsbruck and 223 patients at the University of Freiburg were investigated with regard to their subjective experience of distress. The external constructive validity criteria were established on the basis of the Freiburg Questionnaire of Disease-Coping, the questionnaire of social support and Beck's Depression Inventory. There were significant differences between individuals in the severity of distress in different age groups and in patients in different tumour stages. The internal consistency of the HQ and its subscales proved to be satisfactory demarcation from other psychosocial dimensions and an adequate correlation with similar dimensions (depression, depressive illness coping, social support, compliance). The HQ appears to be an economical and valid screening instrument for detecting the need for psychosocial support in melanoma patients in the out-patient follow-up stage.