Vincent J L
Department of Intensive Care, Erasme University Hospital, Free University of Brussels, Brussels, Belgium.
Crit Care Med. 2001 Feb;29(2 Suppl):N52-5. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200102001-00010.
The exact time of death for many intensive care unit patients is increasingly preceded by an end-of-life decision. Such decisions are fraught with ethical, religious, moral, cultural, and legal difficulties. Key questions surrounding this issue include the difference between withholding and withdrawing, when to withhold/withdraw, who should be involved in the decision-making process, what are the relevant legal precedents, etc. Cultural variations in attitude to such issues are perhaps expected between continents, but key differences also exist on a more local basis, for example, among the countries of Europe. Physicians need to be aware of the potential cultural differences in the attitudes not only of their colleagues, but also of their patients and families. Open discussion of these issues and some change in our attitude toward life and death are needed to enable such patients to have a pain-free, dignified death.
对于许多重症监护病房的患者来说,在确切死亡时间之前,往往就已经做出了临终决定。此类决定充满了伦理、宗教、道德、文化和法律难题。围绕这一问题的关键问题包括停止治疗和撤销治疗之间的区别、何时停止/撤销治疗、谁应参与决策过程、有哪些相关法律先例等等。各大洲之间在对待此类问题的态度上存在文化差异或许是意料之中的,但在更局部的层面,比如欧洲各国之间,也存在关键差异。医生不仅需要意识到同事在态度上可能存在的文化差异,还需意识到患者及其家属态度上的文化差异。需要对这些问题进行公开讨论,并在我们对生死的态度上做出一些改变,以使此类患者能够无痛且有尊严地离世。