Bergholm R, Westerbacka J, Vehkavaara S, Seppälä-Lindroos A, Goto T, Yki-Järvinen H
Division of Diabetes, Department of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki 00290, Finland.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001 Mar;86(3):1403-9. doi: 10.1210/jcem.86.3.7307.
It is unclear whether insulin sensitivity independent of body weight regulates control of heart rate variation (HRV) by the autonomic nervous system. Insulin action on whole-body glucose uptake (M-value) and heart rate variability were measured in 21 normal men. The subjects were divided into 2 groups [normally insulin sensitive (IS, 8.0 +/- 0.4 mg/kg.min) and less insulin sensitive (IR, 5.1 +/- 0.3 mg/kg.min)] based on their median M-value (6.2 mg/kg x min). Spectral power analysis of heart rate variability was performed in the basal state and every 30 min during the insulin infusion. The IS and IR groups were comparable, with respect to age (27 +/- 2 vs. 26 +/- 2 yr), body mass index (22 +/- 1 vs. 23 +/- 1 kg/m(2)), body fat (13 +/- 1 vs. 13 +/- 1%), systolic (121 +/- 16 vs. 117 +/- 14 mm Hg) and diastolic (74 +/- 11 vs. 73 +/- 11 mm Hg) blood pressures, and fasting plasma glucose (5.4 +/- 0.1 vs. 5.5 +/- 0.1 mmol/L) concentrations. Fasting plasma insulin was significantly higher in the IR (30 +/- 4 pmol/L) than in the IS (17 +/- 3 pmol/L, P < 0.05) group. In the IS group, insulin significantly increased the normalized low-frequency (LFn) component, a measure of predominantly sympathetic nervous system activity, from 36 +/- 5 to 48 +/- 4 normalized units (nu; 0 vs. 30-120 min, P < 0.001); whereas the normalized high-frequency (HFn) component, a measure of vagal control of HRV, decreased from 66 +/- 9 to 48 +/- 5 nu (P < 0.001). No changes were observed in either the normalized LF component [35 +/- 5 vs. 36 +/- 2 nu, not significant (NS)] or the normalized HF component (52 +/- 6 vs. 51 +/- 4 nu, NS) in the IR group. The ratio LF/HF, a measure of sympathovagal balance, increased significantly in the IS group (0.92 +/- 0.04 vs. 1.01 +/- 0.04, P < 0.01) but remained unchanged in the IR group (0.91 +/- 0.04 vs. 0.92 +/- 0.03, NS). Heart rate and systolic and diastolic blood pressures remained unchanged during the insulin infusion in both groups. We conclude that insulin acutely shifts sympathovagal control of HRV toward sympathetic dominance in insulin-sensitive, but not in resistant, subjects. These data suggest that sympathetic overactivity is not a consequence of hyperinsulinemia.
体重之外的胰岛素敏感性是否通过自主神经系统调节心率变异性(HRV)尚不清楚。对21名正常男性测量了胰岛素对全身葡萄糖摄取(M值)和心率变异性的作用。根据受试者的M值中位数(6.2mg/kg·min)将其分为两组[正常胰岛素敏感组(IS,8.0±0.4mg/kg·min)和胰岛素敏感性较低组(IR,5.1±0.3mg/kg·min)]。在基础状态下以及胰岛素输注期间每30分钟进行一次心率变异性的频谱功率分析。IS组和IR组在年龄(27±2岁对26±2岁)、体重指数(22±1kg/m²对23±1kg/m²)、体脂(13±1%对13±1%)、收缩压(121±16mmHg对117±14mmHg)和舒张压(74±11mmHg对73±11mmHg)以及空腹血浆葡萄糖浓度(5.4±0.1mmol/L对5.5±0.1mmol/L)方面具有可比性。IR组(30±4pmol/L)的空腹血浆胰岛素显著高于IS组(17±3pmol/L,P<0.05)。在IS组中,胰岛素使主要反映交感神经系统活动的标准化低频(LFn)成分从36±5标准化单位显著增加至48±4标准化单位(nu;0对30 - 120分钟,P<0.001);而反映迷走神经对HRV控制的标准化高频(HFn)成分从66±9nu降至48±5nu(P<0.001)。IR组的标准化LF成分[35±5nu对36±2nu,无显著差异(NS)]或标准化HF成分(52±6nu对51±4nu,NS)均未观察到变化。反映交感迷走平衡的LF/HF比值在IS组显著增加(0.92±0.04对1.01±0.04,P<0.01),但在IR组保持不变(0.91±0.04对0.92±0.03,NS)。两组在胰岛素输注期间心率以及收缩压和舒张压均保持不变。我们得出结论,胰岛素在胰岛素敏感但非抵抗的受试者中急性地将HRV的交感迷走控制转向交感神经占优势。这些数据表明交感神经活动亢进不是高胰岛素血症的结果。