Suppr超能文献

贫困和老年人群中与处方药费用分担相关的不良事件。

Adverse events associated with prescription drug cost-sharing among poor and elderly persons.

作者信息

Tamblyn R, Laprise R, Hanley J A, Abrahamowicz M, Scott S, Mayo N, Hurley J, Grad R, Latimer E, Perreault R, McLeod P, Huang A, Larochelle P, Mallet L

机构信息

McGill University Health Center, Royal Victoria Hospital Site, Ross Pavilion, Room 4-12, 687 Pine Ave W, Montréal, Quebec, Canada H3A 1A1.

出版信息

JAMA. 2001;285(4):421-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.285.4.421.

Abstract

CONTEXT

Rising costs of medications and inequities in access have sparked calls for drug policy reform in the United States and Canada. Control of drug expenditures by prescription cost-sharing for elderly persons and poor persons is a contentious issue because little is known about the health impact in these subgroups.

OBJECTIVES

To determine (1) the impact of introducing prescription drug cost-sharing on use of essential and less essential drugs among elderly persons and welfare recipients and (2) rates of emergency department (ED) visits and serious adverse events associated with reductions in drug use before and after policy implementation.

DESIGN AND SETTING

Interrupted time-series analysis of data from 32 months before and 17 months after introduction of a prescription coinsurance and deductible cost-sharing policy in Quebec in 1996. Separate 10-month prepolicy control and postpolicy cohort studies were conducted to estimate the impact of the drug reform on adverse events.

PARTICIPANTS

A random sample of 93 950 elderly persons and 55 333 adult welfare medication recipients.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Mean daily number of essential and less essential drugs used per month, ED visits, and serious adverse events (hospitalization, nursing home admission, and mortality) before and after policy introduction.

RESULTS

After cost-sharing was introduced, use of essential drugs decreased by 9.12% (95% confidence interval [CI], 8.7%-9.6%) in elderly persons and by 14.42% (95% CI, 13.3%-15.6%) in welfare recipients; use of less essential drugs decreased by 15.14% (95% CI, 14.4%-15.9%) and 22.39% (95% CI, 20.9%-23.9%), respectively. The rate (per 10 000 person-months) of serious adverse events associated with reductions in use of essential drugs increased from 5.8 in the prepolicy control cohort to 12.6 in the postpolicy cohort in elderly persons (a net increase of 6.8 [95% CI, 5.6-8.0]) and from 14.7 to 27.6 in welfare recipients (a net increase of 12.9 [95% CI, 10.2-15.5]). Emergency department visit rates related to reductions in the use of essential drugs also increased by 14.2 (95% CI, 8.5-19.9) per 10 000 person-months in elderly persons (prepolicy control cohort, 32.9; postpolicy cohort, 47.1) and by 54.2 (95% CI, 33.5-74.8) among welfare recipients (prepolicy control cohort, 69.6; postpolicy cohort, 123.8). These increases were primarily due to an increase in the proportion of recipients who reduced their use of essential drugs. Reductions in the use of less essential drugs were not associated with an increase in risk of adverse events or ED visits.

CONCLUSIONS

In our study, increased cost-sharing for prescription drugs in elderly persons and welfare recipients was followed by reductions in use of essential drugs and a higher rate of serious adverse events and ED visits associated with these reductions.

摘要

背景

药品成本上升以及获取药品方面的不平等引发了美国和加拿大对药品政策改革的呼声。通过对老年人和贫困人口实行处方药费用分担来控制药品支出是一个有争议的问题,因为对于这些亚组人群的健康影响知之甚少。

目的

确定(1)引入处方药费用分担对老年人和福利领取者使用基本药物和非基本药物的影响,以及(2)政策实施前后与药物使用减少相关的急诊科就诊率和严重不良事件发生率。

设计与背景

对1996年魁北克引入处方药共付保险和免赔额费用分担政策之前32个月和之后17个月的数据进行中断时间序列分析。分别进行了为期10个月的政策前对照和政策后队列研究,以评估药物改革对不良事件的影响。

参与者

从93950名老年人和55333名成年福利药物领取者中随机抽取的样本。

主要观察指标

政策实施前后每月使用的基本药物和非基本药物的日均数量、急诊科就诊情况以及严重不良事件(住院、入住养老院和死亡)。

结果

引入费用分担后,老年人使用基本药物的量减少了9.12%(95%置信区间[CI],8.7%-9.6%),福利领取者减少了14.42%(95%CI,13.3%-15.6%);非基本药物的使用量分别减少了15.14%(95%CI,14.4%-15.9%)和22.39%(95%CI,20.9%-23.9%)。与基本药物使用减少相关的严重不良事件发生率(每10000人月)在老年人中从政策前对照队列的5.8增加到政策后队列的12.6(净增加6.8[95%CI,5.6-8.0]),在福利领取者中从14.7增加到27.6(净增加12.9[95%CI,10.2-15.5])。与基本药物使用减少相关联的急诊科就诊率在老年人中每10000人月也增加了14.2(95%CI,8.5-19.9)(政策前对照队列,32.9;政策后队列,47.1),在福利领取者中增加了54.2(95%CI,33.5-74.8)(政策前对照队列,69.6;政策后队列,123.8)。这些增加主要是由于减少基本药物使用的领取者比例增加。非基本药物使用的减少与不良事件风险或急诊科就诊增加无关。

结论

在我们的研究中,老年人和福利领取者处方药费用分担增加后,基本药物使用减少,且与这些减少相关的严重不良事件发生率和急诊科就诊率更高。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验