• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

贴片类型对4种测试材料累积刺激可能性的影响。

Effect of patch type on the cumulative irritation potential of 4 test materials.

作者信息

Bagley D M, Boisits E K, Spriggs T L, Schwartz S

机构信息

Colgate-Palmolive Company, Piscataway, NJ 08855-1343, USA.

出版信息

Am J Contact Dermat. 2001 Mar;12(1):25-7. doi: 10.1053/ajcd.2000.8010.

DOI:10.1053/ajcd.2000.8010
PMID:11244136
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Many different patch systems are available for predicting contact dermatitis. It is important to determine the ideal patch to meet the objective of the testing method.

OBJECTIVE

The 21-day cumulative irritation test is well accepted for predicting irritation after repeated exposures. The patch type must allow separation of materials to predict irritation potential in the marketplace. Three patch systems were compared to determine which best provides this separation and prediction.

METHODS

Four test materials were evaluated using 3 patch systems in a 21-day cumulative irritation test. Tested were water, 0.06% sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS), and 2 underarm products (UAP), one having lower and one having higher irritation potential. The patch types were; Webril pad and 8-mm and 12-mm Finn Chambers.

RESULTS

Both the 12-mm Finn Chamber and Webril pad showed the ability to differentiate the higher irritating UAP and the 0.06% SLS from the lower irritation UAP product and water. The 8-mm Finn chamber was less discriminating, showing the 0.06% SLS to be the same as water and the lower-irritating UAP.

CONCLUSION

The Webril pad and the 12-mm Finn Chamber are better at discriminating irritation potential than is the 8-mm Finn Chamber. The 12-mm Finn Chamber might also allow discrimination with a lower degree of irritation.

摘要

背景

有许多不同的贴片系统可用于预测接触性皮炎。确定理想的贴片以满足测试方法的目标很重要。

目的

21天累积刺激试验在预测重复暴露后的刺激性方面得到广泛认可。贴片类型必须能够分离材料,以预测市场上产品的刺激潜力。比较了三种贴片系统,以确定哪种系统能最好地实现这种分离和预测。

方法

在21天累积刺激试验中,使用3种贴片系统对4种测试材料进行评估。测试材料为水、0.06%月桂醇硫酸酯钠(SLS)和2种腋下产品(UAP),其中一种刺激性较低,另一种刺激性较高。贴片类型为:Webril垫以及8毫米和12毫米的Finn Chambers。

结果

12毫米的Finn Chambers和Webril垫都能够区分刺激性较高的UAP以及0.06%的SLS与刺激性较低的UAP产品和水。8毫米的Finn Chambers区分能力较差,显示0.06%的SLS与水以及刺激性较低的UAP相同。

结论

Webril垫和12毫米的Finn Chambers在区分刺激潜力方面比8毫米的Finn Chambers更好。12毫米的Finn Chambers也可能在较低刺激程度下实现区分。

相似文献

1
Effect of patch type on the cumulative irritation potential of 4 test materials.贴片类型对4种测试材料累积刺激可能性的影响。
Am J Contact Dermat. 2001 Mar;12(1):25-7. doi: 10.1053/ajcd.2000.8010.
2
Pitfalls of irritant patch testing using different test chamber sizes.使用不同测试腔室大小进行刺激性斑贴试验的陷阱。
Am J Contact Dermat. 2001 Mar;12(1):28-32. doi: 10.1053/ajcd.2001.19602.
3
Comparing the Influence of Five Patch Types on the Result of a 12-Day Cumulative Irritancy Patch Test.
J Cosmet Sci. 2018 Jan/Feb;69(1):57-66.
4
Skin reaction and recovery: a repeated sodium lauryl sulphate patch test vs. a 24-h patch test and tape stripping.皮肤反应与恢复:重复十二烷基硫酸钠斑贴试验与24小时斑贴试验及胶带剥离试验的对比
Br J Dermatol. 2004 Mar;150(3):493-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2133.2004.05765.x.
5
Simultaneous sodium lauryl sulphate testing improves the diagnostic validity of allergic patch tests. Results from a prospective multicentre study of the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group (Deutsche Kontaktallergie-Gruppe, DKG).同时进行十二烷基硫酸钠测试可提高过敏性斑贴试验的诊断有效性。德国接触性皮炎研究组(Deutsche Kontaktallergie-Gruppe, DKG)前瞻性多中心研究的结果。
Br J Dermatol. 2005 Apr;152(4):709-19. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2004.06465.x.
6
Evaluation of modifications of the traditional patch test in assessing the chemical irritation potential of feminine hygiene products.评估传统斑贴试验的改良方法在评估女性卫生用品化学刺激潜力方面的作用。
Skin Res Technol. 2004 May;10(2):73-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0846.2004.00054.x.
7
The MOAHLFA index of irritant sodium lauryl sulfate reactions: first results of a multicentre study on routine sodium lauryl sulfate patch testing.刺激性月桂醇硫酸酯钠反应的MOAHLFA指数:月桂醇硫酸酯钠常规斑贴试验多中心研究的初步结果
Contact Dermatitis. 2004 Nov-Dec;51(5-6):259-62. doi: 10.1111/j.0105-1873.2004.00458.x.
8
The role of the skin irritation response in polysensitization to fragrances.皮肤刺激反应在香料多重致敏中的作用。
Contact Dermatitis. 2012 Jul;67(1):28-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2012.02055.x. Epub 2012 Mar 22.
9
Which test chambers should be used for acetone, ethanol, and water solutions when patch testing?
Contact Dermatitis. 2007 Aug;57(2):134-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2007.01094.x.
10
Cumulative skin irritation test of sanitary pads in sensitive skin and normal skin population.卫生巾在敏感皮肤和正常皮肤人群中的累积皮肤刺激性试验。
Cutan Ocul Toxicol. 2007;26(1):37-43. doi: 10.1080/15569520601183831.