• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用不同测试腔室大小进行刺激性斑贴试验的陷阱。

Pitfalls of irritant patch testing using different test chamber sizes.

作者信息

Löffler H, Freyschmidt-Paul P, Effendy I, Maibach H I

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, University of Marburg, Germany.

出版信息

Am J Contact Dermat. 2001 Mar;12(1):28-32. doi: 10.1053/ajcd.2001.19602.

DOI:10.1053/ajcd.2001.19602
PMID:11244137
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Test chambers for irritant patch testing are usually larger than those used in allergic patch testing. In general, larger areas show stronger skin reactions than smaller areas.

OBJECTIVE

This study investigated whether this difference is of practical relevance, when a model irritant is applied in small and large Finn chambers and evaluated by measurement of transepidermal water loss (TEWL).

METHODS

Patch testing was performed with 2 concentrations of sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS) (0.25% and 0.5%) on forearms of healthy volunteers. Large (inner diameter, 12 mm) and small (inner diameter, 8 mm) chambers were used.

RESULTS

A variance analysis (3 factors, 2-tailed) showed that the test outcome, as assessed by TEWL, was strongly dependent on SLS test concentration and test chamber size. The larger chambers gave approximately 30% to 50% higher values than the smaller.

CONCLUSIONS

This may be explained by the fact that with the small chambers, the adjacent small area of nontreated skin was also assessed by the evaporimeter, biasing the results. A formula estimating TEWL value of the large chamber from values of the small chambers has been proposed.

摘要

背景

刺激性斑贴试验的测试室通常比过敏性斑贴试验使用的测试室大。一般来说,较大面积的皮肤反应比较小面积的更强。

目的

本研究调查了在小芬氏小室和大芬氏小室中应用模型刺激物并通过测量经表皮水分流失(TEWL)进行评估时,这种差异是否具有实际意义。

方法

在健康志愿者的前臂上使用2种浓度的十二烷基硫酸钠(SLS)(0.25%和0.5%)进行斑贴试验。使用大(内径12毫米)、小(内径8毫米)两种小室。

结果

方差分析(3个因素,双侧)表明,通过TEWL评估的测试结果强烈依赖于SLS测试浓度和测试室大小。大测试室得出的值比较小测试室高约30%至50%。

结论

这可能是因为使用小测试室时,蒸发仪也会测量相邻未处理皮肤的小面积,从而使结果产生偏差。已提出一个根据小测试室的值估算大测试室TEWL值的公式。

相似文献

1
Pitfalls of irritant patch testing using different test chamber sizes.使用不同测试腔室大小进行刺激性斑贴试验的陷阱。
Am J Contact Dermat. 2001 Mar;12(1):28-32. doi: 10.1053/ajcd.2001.19602.
2
Evaluation of skin susceptibility to irritancy by routine patch testing with sodium lauryl sulfate.通过用十二烷基硫酸钠进行常规斑贴试验评估皮肤对刺激物的敏感性。
Eur J Dermatol. 2001 Sep-Oct;11(5):416-9.
3
Effect of patch type on the cumulative irritation potential of 4 test materials.贴片类型对4种测试材料累积刺激可能性的影响。
Am J Contact Dermat. 2001 Mar;12(1):25-7. doi: 10.1053/ajcd.2000.8010.
4
Site variations in susceptibility to SLS.对十二烷基硫酸钠敏感性的部位差异
Contact Dermatitis. 2007 Aug;57(2):94-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2007.01159.x.
5
Simultaneous sodium lauryl sulphate testing improves the diagnostic validity of allergic patch tests. Results from a prospective multicentre study of the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group (Deutsche Kontaktallergie-Gruppe, DKG).同时进行十二烷基硫酸钠测试可提高过敏性斑贴试验的诊断有效性。德国接触性皮炎研究组(Deutsche Kontaktallergie-Gruppe, DKG)前瞻性多中心研究的结果。
Br J Dermatol. 2005 Apr;152(4):709-19. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2004.06465.x.
6
Noninvasive measuring methods for the investigation of irritant patch test reactions. A study of patients with hand eczema, atopic dermatitis and controls.用于刺激性斑贴试验反应研究的非侵入性测量方法。对手部湿疹、特应性皮炎患者及对照组的一项研究。
Acta Derm Venereol Suppl (Stockh). 1992;173:1-26.
7
Intra-individual variation of irritant threshold and relationship to transepidermal water loss measurement of skin irritation.个体内部刺激阈值的变化及其与皮肤刺激性经表皮水分流失测量的关系。
Contact Dermatitis. 2004 Jul;51(1):26-9. doi: 10.1111/j.0105-1873.2004.00386.x.
8
The effect of damaged skin barrier induced by subclinical irritation on the sequential irritant contact dermatitis.亚临床刺激诱导的皮肤屏障损伤对序贯性刺激性接触性皮炎的影响。
Cutan Ocul Toxicol. 2011 Dec;30(4):263-71. doi: 10.3109/15569527.2011.574302. Epub 2011 Jul 20.
9
Artificial disruption of skin barrier prior to irritant patch testing does not improve test design.在进行刺激性斑贴试验之前人为破坏皮肤屏障并不能改善试验设计。
Br J Dermatol. 2004 Jan;150(1):82-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2004.05700.x.
10
Skin reaction and recovery: a repeated sodium lauryl sulphate patch test vs. a 24-h patch test and tape stripping.皮肤反应与恢复:重复十二烷基硫酸钠斑贴试验与24小时斑贴试验及胶带剥离试验的对比
Br J Dermatol. 2004 Mar;150(3):493-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2133.2004.05765.x.