Gardner J L, Lisberger S G
Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Department of Physiology, W. M. Keck Foundation Center for Integrative Neuroscience, and Bioengineering Graduate Group, University of California, San Francisco, California 94143, USA.
J Neurosci. 2001 Mar 15;21(6):2075-84. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-06-02075.2001.
In natural situations, motor activity must often choose a single target when multiple distractors are present. The present paper asks how primate smooth pursuit eye movements choose targets, by analysis of a natural target-selection task. Monkeys tracked two targets that started 1.5 degrees eccentric and moved in different directions (up, right, down, and left) toward the position of fixation. As expected from previous results, the smooth pursuit before the first saccade reflected a vector average of the responses to the two target motions individually. However, post-saccadic smooth eye velocity showed enhancement that was spatially selective for the motion at the endpoint of the saccade. If the saccade endpoint was close to one of the two targets, creating a targeting saccade, then pursuit was selectively enhanced for the visual motion of that target and suppressed for the other target. If the endpoint landed between the two targets, creating an averaging saccade, then post-saccadic smooth eye velocity also reflected a vector average of the two target motions. Saccades with latencies >200 msec were almost always targeting saccades. However, pursuit did not transition from vector-averaging to target-selecting until the occurrence of a saccade, even when saccade latencies were >300 msec. Thus, our data demonstrate that post-saccadic enhancement of pursuit is spatially selective and that noncued target selection for pursuit is time-locked to the occurrence of a saccade. This raises the possibility that the motor commands for saccades play a causal role, not only in enhancing visuomotor transmission for pursuit but also in choosing a target for pursuit.
在自然情况下,当存在多个干扰物时,运动活动通常必须选择单个目标。本文通过分析一项自然目标选择任务,探讨灵长类动物的平稳跟踪眼球运动如何选择目标。猴子跟踪两个起始于离中心1.5度处并沿不同方向(上、右、下和左)朝着注视位置移动的目标。正如先前结果所预期的那样,第一次扫视之前的平稳跟踪反映了对两个目标运动各自反应的矢量平均值。然而,扫视后的平稳眼球速度显示出增强,这种增强对扫视终点处的运动具有空间选择性。如果扫视终点靠近两个目标之一,形成一个靶向扫视,那么对该目标的视觉运动的跟踪会被选择性增强,而对另一个目标的跟踪则被抑制。如果终点落在两个目标之间,形成一个平均扫视,那么扫视后的平稳眼球速度也反映了两个目标运动的矢量平均值。潜伏期大于200毫秒的扫视几乎总是靶向扫视。然而,即使扫视潜伏期大于300毫秒,在扫视发生之前,跟踪并没有从矢量平均转变为目标选择。因此,我们的数据表明,扫视后跟踪的增强具有空间选择性,并且跟踪的非提示目标选择与扫视的发生在时间上是锁定的。这增加了一种可能性,即扫视的运动指令不仅在增强跟踪的视觉运动传递中起因果作用,而且在为跟踪选择目标中也起因果作用。