Kanai R, van der Geest J N, Frens M A
Department of Neuroscience, EE1579, Erasmus MC, P.O. Box 1738, 3000 DR Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Exp Brain Res. 2003 Feb;148(3):300-7. doi: 10.1007/s00221-002-1281-8. Epub 2002 Dec 10.
In this study, we investigated the influence of smooth-pursuit eye movements on saccade initiation in response to a sudden jump of a continuously moving target. We replicated the finding by Tanaka et al. (1998) that saccadic eye movements in the direction opposite to preceding pursuit have longer latencies than those in the same direction. We confirmed that this asymmetry is indeed due to an inhibitory effect of smooth pursuit on saccade initiation in the opposite direction rather than facilitation of saccade initiation in the same direction. The inhibitory effect decreased strongly when subjects knew the jump direction in advance. This supports the notion that the prolonged latencies of backward saccades are not due to orbital mechanics or low-level motor processing. Furthermore, we found that the range of saccade directions inhibited by a pursuit movement is broad, covering all directions that did not have the same horizontal component as the pursuit direction. This is in contrast with the predictions of "Inhibition of Saccade Return" (ISR, Hooge and Frens 2000), which is restricted to a smaller confined area.
在本研究中,我们调查了平稳跟踪眼球运动对响应连续移动目标突然跳跃的扫视启动的影响。我们重复了田中等人(1998年)的发现,即与先前跟踪方向相反的眼球扫视运动的潜伏期比相同方向的扫视运动更长。我们证实,这种不对称确实是由于平稳跟踪对相反方向扫视启动的抑制作用,而不是对相同方向扫视启动的促进作用。当受试者提前知道跳跃方向时,抑制作用会大大降低。这支持了向后扫视潜伏期延长并非由于眼眶力学或低水平运动处理的观点。此外,我们发现,跟踪运动抑制的扫视方向范围很广,涵盖了所有与跟踪方向没有相同水平分量的方向。这与“抑制扫视返回”(ISR,霍格和弗伦斯,2000年)的预测相反,后者仅限于一个较小的受限区域。