• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器人辅助的腹腔镜下人体盆腔淋巴结清扫术。

Robotic assisted, laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection in humans.

作者信息

Guillonneau B, Cappèle O, Martinez J B, Navarra S, Vallancien G

机构信息

Department of Urology, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, University Pierre and Marie Curie, Paris, France.

出版信息

J Urol. 2001 Apr;165(4):1078-81.

PMID:11257641
Abstract

PURPOSE

We evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of robotic assisted, laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection for locally advanced prostate cancer staging.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Robotic assisted, laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection was performed in 10 consecutive patients with mainly T3 M0 prostatic carcinoma (robotic group). Operative, postoperative and pathological parameters were compared with the results of the last 10 patients undergoing conventional, laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection performed with similar indications by the same operator (laparoscopy group).

RESULTS

All operations were performed according to the established protocol with no specific intraoperative or postoperative complications. No conversion was required, and no technical incidents were observed in the robotic group. Mean operating time plus or minus standard deviation for the robotic group was 125 +/- 57 minutes (range 75 to 215), significantly longer than that for the laparoscopy group, which was 60 +/- 15 minutes (p = 0.0013). In the robotic group 2 patients presented with postoperative lymphoceles revealed in 1 by deep venous thrombosis and in the second by obturator pain. In the laparoscopy group 1 patient presented with acute urinary retention. The histological results concerning the number of lymph nodes removed were similar in both groups (p = 0.5).

CONCLUSIONS

We show the technical feasibility of robotic assisted, laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection in humans. Although the benefit of this technique has not yet been established, predictable technological improvements would suggest the development of telesurgery and an improved precision of surgical procedure.

摘要

目的

我们评估机器人辅助腹腔镜盆腔淋巴结清扫术用于局部晚期前列腺癌分期的可行性和疗效。

材料与方法

对10例主要为T3 M0前列腺癌的连续患者实施机器人辅助腹腔镜盆腔淋巴结清扫术(机器人组)。将手术、术后及病理参数与同一操作者对具有相似指征的最后10例接受传统腹腔镜盆腔淋巴结清扫术的患者(腹腔镜组)的结果进行比较。

结果

所有手术均按照既定方案进行,无特定的术中或术后并发症。机器人组无需中转,未观察到技术事故。机器人组平均手术时间(±标准差)为125±57分钟(范围75至215分钟),显著长于腹腔镜组的60±15分钟(p = 0.0013)。机器人组有2例患者出现术后淋巴囊肿,1例伴有深静脉血栓形成,另1例伴有闭孔疼痛。腹腔镜组有1例患者出现急性尿潴留。两组切除淋巴结数量的组织学结果相似(p = 0.5)。

结论

我们展示了机器人辅助腹腔镜盆腔淋巴结清扫术在人体中的技术可行性。尽管该技术的益处尚未确立,但可预见的技术改进表明远程手术的发展以及手术操作精度的提高。

相似文献

1
Robotic assisted, laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection in humans.机器人辅助的腹腔镜下人体盆腔淋巴结清扫术。
J Urol. 2001 Apr;165(4):1078-81.
2
Learning curve and surgical outcome for robotic-assisted hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy: case-matched controlled comparison with laparoscopy and laparotomy for treatment of endometrial cancer.机器人辅助子宫切除术和淋巴结切除术的学习曲线和手术结果:与腹腔镜和开腹手术治疗子宫内膜癌的病例对照比较。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2010 Nov-Dec;17(6):739-48. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2010.07.008.
3
Robotic-assisted laparoscopic extended pelvic lymph node dissection for prostate cancer: surgical technique and experience with the first 99 cases.机器人辅助腹腔镜扩大盆腔淋巴结清扫术治疗前列腺癌:手术技术及首例99例经验
Eur Urol. 2009 Apr;55(4):876-83. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.12.006. Epub 2008 Dec 13.
4
Staging pelvic lymphadenectomy for localized carcinoma of the prostate: a comparison of 3 surgical techniques.局限性前列腺癌的分期盆腔淋巴结清扫术:三种手术技术的比较
J Urol. 1997 Apr;157(4):1337-9.
5
Robotic and laparoscopic high extended pelvic lymph node dissection during radical cystectomy: technique and outcomes.机器人和腹腔镜高位扩展盆腔淋巴结清扫术在根治性膀胱切除术中的应用:技术与结果。
Eur Urol. 2012 Feb;61(2):350-5. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.09.011. Epub 2011 Oct 20.
6
Standardized comparison of robot-assisted limited and extended pelvic lymphadenectomy for prostate cancer.机器人辅助局限性和广泛性前列腺癌盆腔淋巴结切除术的标准化比较。
BJU Int. 2013 Jul;112(1):81-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11788.x. Epub 2013 Jan 25.
7
Lymph node dissection during robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: comparison of lymph node yield and clinical outcomes when including common iliac nodes with standard template dissection.机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术期间的淋巴结清扫术:包括标准模板清扫术的髂总淋巴结时,淋巴结产量和临床结果的比较。
BJU Int. 2010 Aug;106(3):391-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.09102.x. Epub 2010 Jan 19.
8
Comparing conventional laparoscopic to robotic-assisted extended pelvic lymph node dissection in men with intermediate and high-risk prostate cancer: a matched-pair analysis.比较传统腹腔镜与机器人辅助扩大盆腔淋巴结清扫术治疗中高危前列腺癌男性患者:配对分析
Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2017 Feb;69(1):101-107. doi: 10.23736/S0393-2249.16.02799-5. Epub 2016 Nov 10.
9
Detecting lymph nodes metastasis in prostate cancer through extended vs. standard laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy.通过扩大腹腔镜盆腔淋巴结清扫术与标准腹腔镜盆腔淋巴结清扫术检测前列腺癌中的淋巴结转移
Aktuelle Urol. 2010 Jan;41 Suppl 1:S10-4. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1224663. Epub 2010 Jan 21.
10
Laparoscopic extended pelvic lymph node dissection for prostate cancer: description of the surgical technique and initial results.腹腔镜下扩大盆腔淋巴结清扫术治疗前列腺癌:手术技术描述及初步结果
Eur Urol. 2007 Nov;52(5):1347-55. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.04.073. Epub 2007 May 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Lateral Lymph Node Dissection for Advanced Pelvic Cancers: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.机器人手术与腹腔镜下盆腔晚期癌症侧方淋巴结清扫术的比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
J Gastrointest Cancer. 2025 Jul 15;56(1):151. doi: 10.1007/s12029-025-01251-7.
2
Robot assisted lymphadenectomy in urology: pelvic, retroperitoneal and inguinal.泌尿外科机器人辅助淋巴结清扫术:盆腔、腹膜后及腹股沟区
Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2017 Feb;69(1):38-55. doi: 10.23736/S0393-2249.16.02823-X. Epub 2016 Nov 8.
3
Computer-assisted surgery using telemanipulators: an evidence-based analysis.
使用远程操作器的计算机辅助手术:基于证据的分析。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2004;4(1):1-37. Epub 2004 Feb 1.
4
The role of minimally invasive surgery and outcomes in colorectal cancer.微创手术在结直肠癌中的作用及治疗结果
Perm J. 2011 Summer;15(3):61-6. doi: 10.7812/TPP/11-091.
5
Temporal trends and predictors of pelvic lymph node dissection in open or minimally invasive radical prostatectomy.开放或微创根治性前列腺切除术中行盆腔淋巴结清扫术的时间趋势和预测因素。
Cancer. 2011 Sep 1;117(17):3933-42. doi: 10.1002/cncr.25981. Epub 2011 Mar 15.
6
Robotic surgery: applications, limitations, and impact on surgical education.机器人手术:应用、局限性及其对外科教育的影响。
MedGenMed. 2005 Sep 27;7(3):72.
7
Preliminary experience with robot-assisted laparoscopic staging of gynecologic malignancies.机器人辅助腹腔镜妇科恶性肿瘤分期的初步经验。
JSLS. 2005 Apr-Jun;9(2):149-58.
8
Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the new gold standard?
Curr Urol Rep. 2004 Apr;5(2):108-14. doi: 10.1007/s11934-004-0022-x.
9
Laparoscopic and robotic surgical training in urology.泌尿外科的腹腔镜和机器人手术培训。
Curr Urol Rep. 2003 Apr;4(2):130-7. doi: 10.1007/s11934-003-0040-0.