Slaton J W, Morgenstern N, Levy D A, Santos M W, Tamboli P, Ro J Y, Ayala A G, Pettaway C A
Department of Urology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
J Urol. 2001 Apr;165(4):1138-42.
We determine if histopathological factors of the primary penile tumor can stratify the risk of the development of inguinal lymph node metastases.
Clinical records of 48 consecutive patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the penis who underwent resection of the primary lesion and either inguinal lymph node dissection or were observed for signs of recurrence (median followup 59 months) were reviewed. Parameters examined included pathological tumor stage, quantified depth of invasion and tumor thickness, histological and nuclear grade, percentage of poorly differentiated cancer in the primary tumor, number of mitoses and presence or absence of vascular invasion. Variables were compared in 18 lymph node positive and 30 lymph node negative cases.
Pathological tumor stage, vascular invasion and presence of greater than 50% poorly differentiated cancer were the strongest predictors of nodal metastasis on univariate and multivariate regression analyses. None of 15 pT1 tumors exhibited vascular invasion or lymph node metastases. Of 33 patients with pT2 or greater tumors 21 (64%) had vascular invasion and 18 (55%) had metastases. Only 4 of 25 patients (15%) with 50% or less poorly differentiated cancer in the penile tumor had metastases compared with 14 of 23 patients (61%) with greater than 50% poorly differentiated cancer (p = 0.001). No other variables tested were significantly different among the patient cohorts.
Pathological stage of the penile tumor, vascular invasion and greater than 50% poorly differentiated cancer were independent prognostic factors for inguinal lymph node metastasis. Prophylactic lymphadenectomy in compliant patients with pT1 lesions without vascular invasion and 50% or less poorly differentiated cancer does not appear warranted.
我们确定原发性阴茎肿瘤的组织病理学因素是否能对腹股沟淋巴结转移发生风险进行分层。
回顾了48例连续性阴茎鳞状细胞癌患者的临床记录,这些患者均接受了原发性病变切除术,并行腹股沟淋巴结清扫术或接受了复发迹象观察(中位随访59个月)。所检查的参数包括病理肿瘤分期、量化的浸润深度和肿瘤厚度、组织学和核分级、原发性肿瘤中低分化癌的百分比、有丝分裂数以及是否存在血管侵犯。对18例淋巴结阳性和30例淋巴结阴性病例的变量进行了比较。
在单因素和多因素回归分析中,病理肿瘤分期、血管侵犯以及存在超过50%的低分化癌是淋巴结转移最强的预测因素。15例pT1肿瘤均未出现血管侵犯或淋巴结转移。在33例pT2或更高分期肿瘤患者中,21例(64%)有血管侵犯,18例(55%)有转移。阴茎肿瘤中低分化癌占50%或更少的25例患者中只有4例(15%)发生转移,而低分化癌超过50%的23例患者中有14例(61%)发生转移(p = 0.001)。在各患者队列中,所检测的其他变量均无显著差异。
阴茎肿瘤的病理分期、血管侵犯以及超过50%的低分化癌是腹股沟淋巴结转移的独立预后因素。对于无血管侵犯且低分化癌占50%或更少的pT1病变的依从性患者,似乎没有必要进行预防性淋巴结切除术。