• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Alcohol-related policy measures in Ontario: who supports what and to what degree?安大略省与酒精相关的政策措施:谁支持什么以及支持程度如何?
Can J Public Health. 2001 Jan-Feb;92(1):24-8. doi: 10.1007/BF02956139.
2
Trends in public opinion on alcohol policy measures: Ontario 1989-1998.1989 - 1998年安大略省酒精政策措施的公众舆论趋势
J Stud Alcohol. 2001 Mar;62(2):142-9. doi: 10.15288/jsa.2001.62.142.
3
Trends in public opinion on alcohol issues during a period of increasing access to alcohol: Ontario, Canada, 1996-2011.在酒精获取日益容易的时期,公众对酒精问题的舆论趋势:加拿大安大略省,1996 - 2011年
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2014 May;33(3):249-58. doi: 10.1111/dar.12130.
4
Drinking patterns and perspectives on alcohol policy: results from two Ontario surveys.饮酒模式与酒精政策观点:安大略省两项调查的结果
Alcohol Alcohol. 2005 Mar-Apr;40(2):132-9. doi: 10.1093/alcalc/agh120. Epub 2004 Dec 6.
5
Public opinions on alcohol policy issues: a comparison of American and Canadian surveys.关于酒精政策问题的公众意见:美国与加拿大调查的比较
Addiction. 1999 Apr;94(4):521-31. doi: 10.1046/j.1360-0443.1999.9445217.x.
6
Public perception of alcohol policy issues relating directly or indirectly to privatization: results from a 1999 Ontario survey.公众对与私有化直接或间接相关的酒精政策问题的看法:1999年安大略省调查结果
Can J Public Health. 2003 May-Jun;94(3):201-6. doi: 10.1007/BF03405067.
7
Public support for warning labels on alcoholic beverage containers.公众对酒精饮料容器上警示标签的支持。
Br J Addict. 1991 Oct;86(10):1323-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1991.tb01708.x.
8
Trends in public opinion about alcohol policy initiatives in Ontario and the US 1989-91.1989 - 1991年安大略省和美国关于酒精政策倡议的公众舆论趋势。
Drug Alcohol Rev. 1995;14(1):35-47. doi: 10.1080/09595239500185041.
9
Public attitudes towards alcohol control policies in Scotland and England: Results from a mixed-methods study.公众对苏格兰和英格兰酒精控制政策的态度:一项混合方法研究的结果。
Soc Sci Med. 2017 Mar;177:177-189. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.01.037. Epub 2017 Jan 25.
10
Differential perceptions of alcohol policy effectiveness.对酒精政策有效性的不同看法。
J Public Health Policy. 1993 Winter;14(4):413-36.

引用本文的文献

1
Alcohol Health Warning Labels: A Rapid Review with Action Recommendations.酒精健康警示标签:快速审查及行动建议。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 16;19(18):11676. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191811676.
2
Opinions on the Privatization of Distilled-Spirits Sales in Washington State: Did Voters Change Their Minds?关于华盛顿州蒸馏酒销售私有化的观点:选民改变主意了吗?
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2016 Jul;77(4):568-76. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2016.77.568.
3
An exploratory approach to analyzing alcohol control policy opinions held by Ontario adults.对安大略省成年人所持有的酒精控制政策意见进行分析的探索性方法。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2010 Mar;7(3):827-41. doi: 10.3390/ijerph7030827. Epub 2010 Mar 8.

本文引用的文献

1
Public support for the prevention of alcohol-related problems.公众对预防与酒精相关问题的支持。
Drug Alcohol Rev. 1993;12(3):243-50. doi: 10.1080/09595239300185281.
2
Public attitudes to the regulation of alcohol.公众对酒精管制的态度。
Drug Alcohol Rev. 1995;14(2):179-86. doi: 10.1080/09595239500185241.
3
Trends in public opinion about alcohol policy initiatives in Ontario and the US 1989-91.1989 - 1991年安大略省和美国关于酒精政策倡议的公众舆论趋势。
Drug Alcohol Rev. 1995;14(1):35-47. doi: 10.1080/09595239500185041.
4
Public opinions on alcohol policy issues: a comparison of American and Canadian surveys.关于酒精政策问题的公众意见:美国与加拿大调查的比较
Addiction. 1999 Apr;94(4):521-31. doi: 10.1046/j.1360-0443.1999.9445217.x.
5
Alcohol and the U.S.-Canada border: trade disputes and border traffic problems.酒精与美加边境:贸易争端及边境交通问题
J Public Health Policy. 1998;19(1):68-87.
6
Public opinion on alcohol policies.关于酒精政策的公众舆论。
J Public Health Policy. 1990 Summer;11(2):189-205.
7
Public attitudes toward increasing the price of alcoholic beverages.
J Stud Alcohol. 1978 Sep;39(9):1630-2. doi: 10.15288/jsa.1978.39.1630.

安大略省与酒精相关的政策措施:谁支持什么以及支持程度如何?

Alcohol-related policy measures in Ontario: who supports what and to what degree?

作者信息

Anglin L, Kavanagh L, Giesbrecht N

机构信息

Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Addiction Research Foundation Site, 33 Russell Street, Toronto, ON, M5S 2S1.

出版信息

Can J Public Health. 2001 Jan-Feb;92(1):24-8. doi: 10.1007/BF02956139.

DOI:10.1007/BF02956139
PMID:11257985
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6979673/
Abstract

Using 1998 provincial survey data (n = 1,205), the authors examine responses to 7 items concerning public opinion on alcohol-related policy in Ontario. The purpose of the study is to get a sense of overall public opinion on certain topical policy-related measures and to see whether this opinion is predicted by demographic characteristics of respondents (sex, age and self-reported drinking pattern). Cross-tabulations of opinion items with demographic variables revealed strong majority support for the status quo with regard to number of liquor and beer stores, beer and liquor store hours, and prohibition of the sale of alcohol in corner stores. A somewhat less robust majority also supported the status quo for alcohol taxes and legal drinking age. Among the demographic groups, high-risk heavy drinkers stood out for their greater support of relaxation of controls and this finding was confirmed by means of logistic regression. The majority of all groups, except frequent bar-goers, liked the idea of warning labels on alcoholic beverage containers. The authors conclude that, according to these survey data, policy initiatives towards greater access to alcohol, such as extended liquor store hours and sale of alcohol in corner stores, are not mandated by the majority of the population of Ontario.

摘要

作者利用1998年省级调查数据(n = 1205),研究了安大略省民众对7项与酒精相关政策的民意调查反馈。该研究旨在了解公众对某些热门政策相关措施的总体看法,并探究这种看法是否可由受访者的人口统计学特征(性别、年龄和自我报告的饮酒模式)预测。意见项目与人口统计学变量的交叉列表显示,在酒类和啤酒商店数量、啤酒和酒类商店营业时间以及街角商店禁止售酒方面,绝大多数人支持维持现状。在酒精税和法定饮酒年龄方面,支持维持现状的多数群体的态度则没那么坚决。在各人口统计群体中,高风险重度饮酒者对放宽管控的支持度格外高,这一发现通过逻辑回归得到了证实。除了经常光顾酒吧的人之外,所有群体中的大多数人都赞成在酒精饮料容器上设置警示标签的想法。作者得出结论,根据这些调查数据,安大略省的大多数民众并不支持诸如延长酒类商店营业时间和在街角商店售酒等增加酒精获取途径的政策举措。