关于两篇有关广泛性和特定性认知缺陷文章的述评。
Commentary on two articles concerning generalized and specific cognitive deficits.
作者信息
Chapman L J, Chapman J P
机构信息
University of Wisconsin-Madison, USA.
出版信息
J Abnorm Psychol. 2001 Feb;110(1):31-9. doi: 10.1037//0021-843x.110.1.31.
This is a commentary on essays in this journal issue by M. E. Strauss (2001) and R. A. Knight and S. M. Silverstein (2001) on research methodology for studying cognitive deficits. Concentrating mostly on Knight and Silverstein's article, the authors review the psychometric issues in the matched-task design, analyze Knight and Silverstein's "process-oriented" objections to that design, and scrutinize their methods for studying cognitive deficits, examining 2 of their empirical studies as examples of those methods.
这是对本期杂志中由M.E.施特劳斯（2001年）以及R.A.奈特和S.M.西尔弗斯坦（2001年）撰写的关于研究认知缺陷的研究方法的论文的评论。作者主要聚焦于奈特和西尔弗斯坦的文章，回顾了匹配任务设计中的心理测量问题，分析了奈特和西尔弗斯坦对该设计的“以过程为导向”的反对意见，并仔细审查了他们研究认知缺陷的方法，以他们的两项实证研究为例对这些方法进行了考察。
Zotero 插件