Suppr超能文献

执行功能障碍对言语列表学习和故事回忆的差异影响。

Differential impact of executive dysfunction on verbal list learning and story recall.

作者信息

Tremont G, Halpert S, Javorsky D J, Stern R A

机构信息

Brown University School of Medicine, Providence, RI, USA.

出版信息

Clin Neuropsychol. 2000 Aug;14(3):295-302. doi: 10.1076/1385-4046(200008)14:3;1-P;FT295.

Abstract

The California Verbal Learning Test (CVLT) and the Logical Memory (LM) subtest from the Wechsler Memory Scale-Revised (WMS-R) are generally thought to be interchangeable measures of verbal memory. However, little is known about the effects of executive dysfunction on these tasks. The present study involved 96 patients referred for neuropsychological evaluation who were classified as having either significant executive dysfunction (SED) or minimal executive dysfunction (MED) based on the number of impaired executive tasks. Results showed that the SED group performed significantly worse on CVLT total words learned and most of the recall conditions compared to the MED patients (p <.01). However, performance on both immediate and delayed LM did not significantly differentiate the groups. CVLT measures of semantic clustering, perseveration, intrusions, and false positive errors did not appear to account for the group differences. The current study strongly suggests that the CVLT and the LM subtest are differentially associated with executive dysfunction, and argues for the inclusion of both types of tasks in a comprehensive neuropsychological evaluation.

摘要

加利福尼亚言语学习测验(CVLT)以及韦氏记忆量表修订版(WMS - R)中的逻辑记忆(LM)子测验通常被认为是言语记忆的可互换测量方法。然而,关于执行功能障碍对这些任务的影响却知之甚少。本研究纳入了96名因神经心理评估前来就诊的患者,根据执行任务受损的数量将他们分为显著执行功能障碍(SED)组或轻度执行功能障碍(MED)组。结果显示,与MED患者相比,SED组在CVLT所学单词总数以及大多数回忆条件下的表现显著更差(p <.01)。然而,即时和延迟LM的表现并未显著区分两组。CVLT在语义聚类、持续错误、侵入错误和假阳性错误方面的测量结果似乎无法解释组间差异。当前研究强烈表明,CVLT和LM子测验与执行功能障碍存在不同的关联,并主张在全面的神经心理评估中纳入这两种类型的任务。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验