Rhode Island Hospital/Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI 02903, USA.
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2010 Jul;32(6):630-6. doi: 10.1080/13803390903401328.
There are no accepted guidelines establishing the most sensitive neuropsychological methods to define memory impairment in mild cognitive impairment (MCI). We investigated whether similar impairment rates were observed between the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT-R) and Logical Memory (LM) in 90 patients with amnestic or amnestic plus MCI. On HVLT-R delayed recall, 80% of participants performed in the MCI range compared to only 32.2% on LM II. The same pattern was seen for both amnestic and amnestic plus subtypes. Individuals impaired on HVLT-R delayed recall performed significantly worse on LM first recall and on delayed recall of LM Story A than those not impaired. MCI patients with executive dysfunction performed significantly worse than patients with no executive impairment on both LM I and HVLT-R Total Learning, but not for delayed recall of either measure. Future studies can address the longitudinal course of impairment on these measures.
目前尚无公认的指南来确定最敏感的神经心理学方法,以定义轻度认知障碍(MCI)中的记忆障碍。我们研究了在 90 名有遗忘或遗忘加 MCI 的患者中,霍普金斯词语学习测试修订版(HVLT-R)和逻辑记忆(LM)之间是否观察到类似的损伤率。在 HVLT-R 延迟回忆中,80%的参与者表现为 MCI 范围,而 LM II 仅为 32.2%。在遗忘和遗忘加亚型中均出现了相同的模式。在 HVLT-R 延迟回忆中受损的个体在 LM 首次回忆和 LM 故事 A 的延迟回忆方面的表现明显差于未受损的个体。执行功能障碍的 MCI 患者在 LM I 和 HVLT-R 总学习方面的表现明显差于无执行功能障碍的患者,但在这两种测试的延迟回忆方面则不然。未来的研究可以解决这些测试中损伤的纵向过程。