Suppr超能文献

[牛术前准备的四种方案比较]

[Comparison of four protocols for preoperative preparation in cattle].

作者信息

Bédard S, Desrochers A, Fecteau G, Higgins R

机构信息

Clinique vétérinaire R-D-L Enr., 205, rue Lafontaine, Rivière-du-Loup, Québec, G5R 3A6.

出版信息

Can Vet J. 2001 Mar;42(3):199-203.

Abstract

This study was designed to evaluate 4 preoperative skin preparations, that is, more specifically, to compare the efficacy of chlorhexidine gluconate (CG) and povidone-iodine (PI), as well as 2 hair removal techniques (clipper alone or clipper followed by razor) for preoperative skin preparation in cattle. The 4 protocols resulted in a significant decrease in the number of bacterial colony-forming units (cfu). Group 4 (clipping + shaving + CG) had a significantly lower number of preoperative cfu per gel plate compared with groups 1 (clipping + PI) and 3 (clipping + shaving + PI). Skin reaction frequency was significantly higher in groups 3 and 4 (47.8% for both protocols) than in groups 1 and 2 (clipping + PI or CG) (8.7% for both). Wound infection frequency was 4.3% (4/92) and no significant difference was observed between the 4 treatment groups. The 4 protocols tested were equivalent as to efficacy and satisfactorily decreased skin microflora. Clipping alone was shown to be preferable to clipping plus shaving as a method of hair removal in cattle, with fewer skin reactions and no more wound infections.

摘要

本研究旨在评估4种术前皮肤准备方法,更具体地说,是比较葡萄糖酸氯己定(CG)和聚维酮碘(PI)的效果,以及2种脱毛技术(仅用剪毛器或先用剪毛器再用剃刀)在牛术前皮肤准备中的效果。这4种方案均使细菌菌落形成单位(cfu)数量显著减少。与第1组(剪毛+PI)和第3组(剪毛+剃毛+PI)相比,第4组(剪毛+剃毛+CG)每个凝胶平板的术前cfu数量显著更低。第3组和第4组的皮肤反应频率(两种方案均为47.8%)显著高于第1组和第2组(剪毛+PI或CG)(两种方案均为8.7%)。伤口感染频率为4.3%(4/92),4个治疗组之间未观察到显著差异。所测试的4种方案在效果上相当,且能令人满意地减少皮肤微生物群。在牛脱毛方法中,仅用剪毛器被证明比剪毛加剃毛更可取,皮肤反应更少,伤口感染也没有更多。

相似文献

2
Comparative evaluation of two surgical scrub preparations in cattle.
Vet Surg. 1996 Jul-Aug;25(4):336-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-950x.1996.tb01422.x.
3
Comparison of two surgical site protocols for cattle in a field setting.两种牛手术部位方案在野外环境中的比较。
Vet Surg. 2013 Feb;42(2):223-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-950X.2013.01089.x. Epub 2013 Feb 1.
6
Evaluation of surgical scrub methods for large animal surgeons.大型动物外科医生手术刷手法的评估
Vet Surg. 1997 Sep-Oct;26(5):382-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-950x.1997.tb01697.x.
10
Comparison of three skin preparation techniques. Part 2: Clinical trial in 100 dogs.
Vet Surg. 1990 Jan-Feb;19(1):20-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-950x.1990.tb01137.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Application of chlorous acid water for disinfection of surgical site in dairy cows.氯酸水在奶牛手术部位消毒中的应用
Front Vet Sci. 2025 Feb 26;12:1444674. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2025.1444674. eCollection 2025.
9
Synovial fluid changes in induced infectious arthritis in calves.犊牛诱导性感染性关节炎中的滑液变化
J Vet Intern Med. 2005 May-Jun;19(3):336-43. doi: 10.1892/0891-6640(2005)19[336:sfciii]2.0.co;2.

本文引用的文献

1
Skin disinfection.皮肤消毒。
J Clin Pathol. 1961 Jan;14(1):85-90. doi: 10.1136/jcp.14.1.85.
4
Comparative evaluation of two surgical scrub preparations in cattle.
Vet Surg. 1996 Jul-Aug;25(4):336-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-950x.1996.tb01422.x.
6
Agents and techniques for disinfection of the skin.
Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1981 May;152(5):677-85.
7
The influence of hair-removal methods on wound infections.脱毛方法对伤口感染的影响。
Arch Surg. 1983 Mar;118(3):347-52. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1983.01390030079013.
10
Skin disinfection.皮肤消毒。
Johns Hopkins Med J. 1970 Mar;126(3):169-76.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验