• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Child literacy promotion in the emergency department.

作者信息

Nagamine W H, Ishida J T, Williams D R, Yamamoto R I, Yamamoto L G

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, University of Hawaii, John A. Burns School of Medicine, Kapiolani Medical Center for Women and Children, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA.

出版信息

Pediatr Emerg Care. 2001 Feb;17(1):19-21. doi: 10.1097/00006565-200102000-00005.

DOI:10.1097/00006565-200102000-00005
PMID:11265901
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Studies using primary health care settings to promote literacy have demonstrated success. Since socioeconomically disadvantaged children have less access to primary care, obtaining much of their medical care episodically in emergency departments (ED), the purpose of this study is to investigate the effectiveness of a simple literacy promotion program conducted in the ED and to determine its efficacy and if there is a difference in promoting literacy with a brochure alone versus a brochure plus a children's book.

METHODS

Medical student study investigators enrolled patients aged 20 months to 7 years undergoing acute care treatment and evaluation in an ED. Subjects were randomized to a literacy promotion brochure versus a brochure plus a children's book. Phone follow-up interviews were conducted to survey the degree of parental reading taking place at home.

RESULTS

Fifty-one families were enrolled, 8 could not be contacted for follow-up, which left 43 families. Twenty-eight were randomized to book + handout and 15 were randomized to handout alone. On follow-up phone interviews, no significant change in reading was demonstrated regardless of whether a brochure alone was given or a book was given with the brochure.

CONCLUSION

Literacy promotion in the ED was not associated with any measurable improvement in parent-child reading. This could mean that the ED is not an effective place to promote literacy or confounding factors in this study are responsible for failing to demonstrate a measurable benefit.

摘要

相似文献

1
Child literacy promotion in the emergency department.
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2001 Feb;17(1):19-21. doi: 10.1097/00006565-200102000-00005.
2
Evaluation of a clinic-based program to promote book sharing and bedtime routines among low-income urban families with young children.评估一项基于诊所的项目,该项目旨在促进低收入城市地区有幼儿的家庭中的图书分享和睡前常规活动。
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1998 May;152(5):459-65. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.152.5.459.
3
Literacy promotion for Hispanic families in a primary care setting: a randomized, controlled trial.在初级保健环境中对西班牙裔家庭进行扫盲促进:一项随机对照试验。
Pediatrics. 1999 May;103(5 Pt 1):993-7. doi: 10.1542/peds.103.5.993.
4
Child centered literacy orientation: a form of social capital?以儿童为中心的读写能力导向:一种社会资本形式?
Pediatrics. 1999 Apr;103(4):e55. doi: 10.1542/peds.103.4.e55.
5
Literacy promotion in primary care pediatrics: can we make a difference?基层医疗儿科中的扫盲促进:我们能有所作为吗?
Pediatrics. 2000 Apr;105(4 Pt 2):927-34.
6
Improving health literacy: use of an informational brochure improves parents' understanding of their child's fluoroscopic examination.提高健康素养:使用信息手册可提高家长对孩子透视检查的理解。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015 Jan;204(1):W95-W103. doi: 10.2214/AJR.14.12573.
7
Effectiveness of a primary care intervention to support reading aloud: a multicenter evaluation.一项支持大声朗读的初级保健干预措施的有效性:多中心评估。
Ambul Pediatr. 2005 Jul-Aug;5(4):209-15. doi: 10.1367/A04-110R.1.
8
Effects of a Family Literacy Program for Latino Parents: Evidence From a Single-Subject Design.家庭扫盲计划对拉丁裔父母的影响:来自单一被试设计的证据。
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2019 Jul 12;50(3):356-372. doi: 10.1044/2018_LSHSS-18-0035. Epub 2019 May 21.
9
An English-language clinic-based literacy program is effective for a multilingual population.一个基于诊所的英语读写能力项目对多语言人群有效。
Pediatrics. 2002 May;109(5):E76-6. doi: 10.1542/peds.109.5.e76.
10
Fever education: does it reduce parent fever anxiety?发热知识教育:它能减轻家长对发热的焦虑吗?
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2001 Feb;17(1):47-51. doi: 10.1097/00006565-200102000-00014.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness of a coordinated community effort to promote early literacy behaviors.协调社区努力促进早期读写行为的有效性。
Matern Child Health J. 2011 Aug;15(6):765-71. doi: 10.1007/s10995-010-0637-0.