1 University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015 Jan;204(1):W95-W103. doi: 10.2214/AJR.14.12573.
The purpose of this study was to determine parents' knowledge about pediatric fluoroscopic procedures and potential risk from ionizing radiation before and after being given an informational brochure.
We reviewed responses from 120 randomly selected participants who were parents or guardians of pediatric patients undergoing diagnostic fluoroscopic examinations. A questionnaire assessed participants' knowledge of the procedure, radiation exposure, and whether their child had a prior examination before and after receiving an informational brochure. In a feedback survey, participants rated the brochure. A repeated measures mixed model was used to evaluate the effect of the brochure on the participants' knowledge.
Participant demographics were women (79%), English speaking (99%), white (90%), and education higher than 12th grade (76%). The median age of patients undergoing the fluoroscopic examination was 4 years. Participant knowledge increased (p < 0.0001) between pre- and postbrochure (least-squares means) for those without a previous examination from 38.3 to 63.4 (total test score) and from 46.3 to 61.8 for those with a prior examination. The proportion of correct answers was higher (p < 0.0001) postbrochure compared with pre-brochure in areas of examination name (99% vs 93%), procedure details (97% vs 87%); use of radiation (100% vs 68%), and radiation dose comparison (79% vs 25%). Overall, 99% (119/120) rated the brochure "good" or "great" (p < 0.0001).
An informational brochure given to participants before their child's fluoroscopic procedure improved their knowledge of the examination and radiation exposure. No participants refused their child's examination.
本研究旨在确定家长在接受信息手册前后对儿科透视检查的了解程度和潜在的电离辐射风险。
我们回顾了 120 名随机选择的接受诊断性透视检查的儿科患者的家长或监护人的答卷。问卷评估了参与者对检查程序、辐射暴露的了解,以及他们的孩子在接受信息手册前后是否有过之前的检查。在反馈调查中,参与者对手册进行了评分。采用重复测量混合模型评估手册对参与者知识的影响。
参与者的人口统计学特征为女性(79%)、讲英语(99%)、白人(90%)和教育程度高于 12 年级(76%)。接受透视检查的患者的中位年龄为 4 岁。与手册前相比,没有之前检查的参与者(最小二乘均值)的知识水平在透视检查前后分别从 38.3 增加到 63.4(总测试得分),而之前有检查的参与者则从 46.3 增加到 61.8。手册后与手册前相比,正确答案的比例更高(p < 0.0001),包括检查名称(99%对 93%)、检查细节(97%对 87%)、辐射使用(100%对 68%)和辐射剂量比较(79%对 25%)。总体而言,99%(119/120)的参与者对手册评价为“好”或“很好”(p < 0.0001)。
在孩子进行透视检查之前,向参与者发放信息手册可以提高他们对检查和辐射暴露的了解。没有参与者拒绝他们孩子的检查。