Metz C E
Semin Nucl Med. 1978 Oct;8(4):283-98. doi: 10.1016/s0001-2998(78)80014-2.
The limitations of diagnostic "accuracy" as a measure of decision performance require introduction of the concepts of the "sensitivity" and "specificity" of a diagnostic test. These measures and the related indices, "true positive fraction" and "false positive fraction," are more meaningful than "accuracy," yet do not provide a unique description of diagnostic performance because they depend on the arbitrary selection of a decision threshold. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve is shown to be a simple yet complete empirical description of this decision threshold effect, indicating all possible combinations of the relative frequencies of the various kinds of correct and incorrect decisions. Practical experimental techniques for measuring ROC curves are described, and the issues of case selection and curve-fitting are discussed briefly. Possible generalizations of conventional ROC analysis to account for decision performance in complex diagnostic tasks are indicated. ROC analysis is shown to be related in a direct and natural way to cost/benefit analysis of diagnostic decision making. The concepts of "average diagnostic cost" and "average net benefit" are developed and used to identify the optimal compromise among various kinds of diagnostic error. Finally, the way in which ROC analysis can be employed to optimize diagnostic strategies is suggested.
将诊断“准确性”作为决策性能衡量指标存在局限性,这就需要引入诊断试验“敏感性”和“特异性”的概念。这些指标以及相关指数“真阳性率”和“假阳性率”比“准确性”更具意义,但由于它们依赖于决策阈值的任意选择,因此并不能对诊断性能进行唯一描述。结果表明,受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线是对这种决策阈值效应的一种简单而完整的经验性描述,它表明了各种正确和错误决策相对频率的所有可能组合。文中描述了测量ROC曲线的实际实验技术,并简要讨论了病例选择和曲线拟合问题。指出了将传统ROC分析进行可能的推广,以考虑复杂诊断任务中的决策性能。结果表明,ROC分析与诊断决策的成本/效益分析有着直接且自然的联系。文中提出了“平均诊断成本”和“平均净效益”的概念,并用于确定各种诊断错误之间的最佳折衷方案。最后,提出了利用ROC分析优化诊断策略的方法。