Metz C E
Invest Radiol. 1986 Sep;21(9):720-33. doi: 10.1097/00004424-198609000-00009.
If the performance of a diagnostic imaging system is to be evaluated objectively and meaningfully, one must compare radiologists' image-based diagnoses with actual states of disease and health in a way that distinguishes between the inherent diagnostic capacity of the radiologists' interpretations of the images, and any tendencies to "under-read" or "over-read". ROC methodology provides the only known basis for distinguishing between these two aspects of diagnostic performance. After identifying the fundamental issues that motivate ROC analysis, this article develops ROC concepts in an intuitive way. The requirements of a valid ROC study and practical techniques for ROC data collection and data analysis are sketched briefly. A survey of the radiologic literature indicates the broad variety of evaluation studies in which ROC analysis has been employed.
如果要客观且有意义地评估诊断成像系统的性能,就必须将放射科医生基于图像的诊断与疾病和健康的实际状况进行比较,这种比较方式要能区分放射科医生对图像解读的内在诊断能力以及任何“漏读”或“过度解读”的倾向。ROC方法是区分诊断性能这两个方面的唯一已知依据。在确定了推动ROC分析的基本问题之后,本文以直观的方式阐述了ROC概念。简要概述了有效ROC研究的要求以及ROC数据收集和数据分析的实用技术。对放射学文献的调查表明,已采用ROC分析的评估研究种类繁多。