Suppr超能文献

杀戮场幸存者口述中的“雄辩的混乱”:暴行与叙事化探究

'Eloquent chaos' in the oral discourse of killing fields survivors: an exploration of atrocity and narrativization.

作者信息

Uehara E S, Farris M, Morelli P T, Ishisaka A

机构信息

University of Washington, Seattle, USA.

出版信息

Cult Med Psychiatry. 2001 Mar;25(1):29-61. doi: 10.1023/a:1005606014694.

Abstract

If "narrative" implies a form of discourse in which sequenced events are meaningfully connected, an "anti-narrative" is a chaotic discourse form "of time without sequence, telling without mediation, and speaking about oneself without being fully able to reflect on oneself" (Frank 1995: 98). This paper examines narratives and anti-narratives in the oral discourses of survivors of the Cambodian killing fields. Through an extended analysis of two cases, we demonstrate the internal logic and "eloquence" of anti-narratives--i.e., the ways in which anti-narrative patterns vividly express and reveal a survivor's complex and continuing experience of atrocity.

摘要

如果“叙事”意味着一种话语形式,其中按顺序排列的事件有意义地相互关联,那么“反叙事”就是一种混乱的话语形式,“是没有顺序的时间、没有中介的讲述、以及无法充分反思自身地谈论自己”(弗兰克,1995:98)。本文考察柬埔寨杀戮场幸存者口述话语中的叙事与反叙事。通过对两个案例的深入分析,我们展示了反叙事的内在逻辑和“雄辩性”——即反叙事模式生动表达和揭示幸存者复杂且持续的暴行经历的方式。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验