Uehara E S, Farris M, Morelli P T, Ishisaka A
University of Washington, Seattle, USA.
Cult Med Psychiatry. 2001 Mar;25(1):29-61. doi: 10.1023/a:1005606014694.
If "narrative" implies a form of discourse in which sequenced events are meaningfully connected, an "anti-narrative" is a chaotic discourse form "of time without sequence, telling without mediation, and speaking about oneself without being fully able to reflect on oneself" (Frank 1995: 98). This paper examines narratives and anti-narratives in the oral discourses of survivors of the Cambodian killing fields. Through an extended analysis of two cases, we demonstrate the internal logic and "eloquence" of anti-narratives--i.e., the ways in which anti-narrative patterns vividly express and reveal a survivor's complex and continuing experience of atrocity.
如果“叙事”意味着一种话语形式,其中按顺序排列的事件有意义地相互关联,那么“反叙事”就是一种混乱的话语形式,“是没有顺序的时间、没有中介的讲述、以及无法充分反思自身地谈论自己”(弗兰克,1995:98)。本文考察柬埔寨杀戮场幸存者口述话语中的叙事与反叙事。通过对两个案例的深入分析,我们展示了反叙事的内在逻辑和“雄辩性”——即反叙事模式生动表达和揭示幸存者复杂且持续的暴行经历的方式。