Suppr超能文献

d-2-(6'-甲氧基-2'-萘基)丙酸(萘普生)在风湿性疾病中的临床评估

Clinical evaluation of d-2-(6'-methoxy-2'-naphthyl)propionic acid (naproxen) in rheumatic conditions.

作者信息

Messias A R, Brito A S, de Oliveira I L

出版信息

J Clin Pharmacol. 1975 Apr;15(4 Pt. 2):324-6. doi: 10.1002/j.1552-4604.1975.tb01459.x.

Abstract

A double-blind, crossover trial with 40 patients suffering from classic or definite rheumatoid arthritis was undertaken to obtain a clinical evaluation of naproxen in the disease. Each patient received either naproxen (500 mg/day) or placebo for 20 days and was then switched to the other compound for 20 days. For final evaluation, 22 cases were eliminated for various reasons, leaving 18 patients: seven cases of classical rheumatoid arthritis and 11 cases of definite rheumatoid arthritis. Optimum or very good efficacy of the active compound was present in 66.6 per cent of the cases versus 11.1 per cent of the placebo group. Doubtful or nil activity was observed in 66.6 per cent of the cases receiving placebo versus 16.6 per cent for naproxen. In addition, of the 22 cases that were eliminated from the final evaluation, but which were seen for the first ten-day follow-up visit while taking the active drug, optimum or very good efficacy was seen in 13. Therefore, this trial showed that naproxen achieved antiinflammatory and analgesic activity far superior to that observed with placebo.

摘要

对40例患有典型或确诊类风湿性关节炎的患者进行了一项双盲交叉试验,以对萘普生在该疾病中的疗效进行临床评估。每位患者接受萘普生(500毫克/天)或安慰剂治疗20天,然后换用另一种药物再治疗20天。最终评估时,22例患者因各种原因被排除,剩下18例患者:7例典型类风湿性关节炎患者和11例确诊类风湿性关节炎患者。活性化合物显示最佳或非常好疗效的病例占66.6%,而安慰剂组为11.1%。接受安慰剂的病例中66.6%观察到可疑或无活性,而萘普生组为16.6%。此外,在最终评估中被排除,但在服用活性药物的前十天随访中接受观察的22例患者中,13例显示最佳或非常好的疗效。因此,该试验表明萘普生的抗炎和镇痛活性远优于安慰剂。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验