Suppr超能文献

在密西西比河下游三角洲地区农村的电话用户家庭和非电话用户家庭中,电话调查方式进行的24小时膳食回顾的有效性。

Validity of a telephone-administered 24-hour dietary recall in telephone and non-telephone households in the rural Lower Mississippi Delta region.

作者信息

Bogle M, Stuff J, Davis L, Forrester I, Strickland E, Casey P H, Ryan D, Champagne C, McGee B, Mellad K, Neal E, Zaghloul S, Yadrick K, Horton J

机构信息

Delta NIRI, Three Financial Centre, 900 S. Shackleford, Ste. 200, Little Rock, AR 72211, USA.

出版信息

J Am Diet Assoc. 2001 Feb;101(2):216-22. doi: 10.1016/S0002-8223(01)00056-6.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine if 24-hour dietary recall data are influenced by whether data are collected by telephone or face-to-face interviews in telephone and non-telephone households.

DESIGN

Dual sampling frame of telephone and non-telephone households. In telephone households, participants completed a 24-hour dietary recall either by face-to-face interview or telephone interview. In non-telephone households, participants completed a 24-hour dietary recall either by face-to-face interview or by using a cellular telephone provided by a field interviewer.

SUBJECTS/SETTING: Four hundred nine participants from the rural Delta region of Arkansas, Louisiana, and Mississippi.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Mean energy and protein intakes.

STATISTICAL ANALYSES PERFORMED

Comparison of telephone and non-telephone households, controlling for type of interview, and comparison of telephone and face-to-face interviews in each household type using unpaired t tests and linear regression, adjusting for gender, age, and body mass index.

RESULTS

Mean differences between telephone and face-to-face interviews for telephone households were -171 kcal (P = 0.1) and -6.9 g protein (P = 0.2), and for non-telephone households -143 kcal (P = 0.6) and 0.4 g protein (P = 1.0). Mean differences between telephone and non-telephone households for telephone interviews were 0 kcal (P = 1.0) and -0.9 g protein (P = 0.9), and for face-to-face interviews 28 kcal (P = 0.9) and 6.4 g protein (P = 0.5). Findings persisted when adjusted for gender, age, and body mass index. No statistically significant differences were detected for mean energy or protein intake between telephone and face-to-face interviews or between telephone and non-telephone households.

APPLICATIONS/CONCLUSIONS: These data provide support that telephone surveys adequately describe energy and protein intakes for a rural, low-income population.

摘要

目的

确定在电话用户家庭和非电话用户家庭中,24小时饮食回顾数据是否会受到数据收集方式是电话访谈还是面对面访谈的影响。

设计

电话用户家庭和非电话用户家庭的双重抽样框架。在电话用户家庭中,参与者通过面对面访谈或电话访谈完成24小时饮食回顾。在非电话用户家庭中,参与者通过面对面访谈或使用现场访谈员提供的手机完成24小时饮食回顾。

对象/地点:来自阿肯色州、路易斯安那州和密西西比州农村三角洲地区的409名参与者。

主要观察指标

平均能量和蛋白质摄入量。

进行的统计分析

比较电话用户家庭和非电话用户家庭,并控制访谈类型;使用不成对t检验和线性回归,比较每种家庭类型中电话访谈和面对面访谈的差异,并对性别、年龄和体重指数进行调整。

结果

电话用户家庭中,电话访谈和面对面访谈的平均差异为-171千卡(P = 0.1)和-6.9克蛋白质(P = 0.2);非电话用户家庭中,平均差异为-143千卡(P = 0.6)和0.4克蛋白质(P = 1.0)。电话访谈中,电话用户家庭和非电话用户家庭的平均差异为0千卡(P = 1.0)和-0.9克蛋白质(P = 0.9);面对面访谈中,平均差异为28千卡(P = 0.9)和6.4克蛋白质(P = 0.5)。在对性别、年龄和体重指数进行调整后,结果依然如此。电话访谈和面对面访谈之间,以及电话用户家庭和非电话用户家庭之间,平均能量或蛋白质摄入量均未检测到统计学上的显著差异。

应用/结论:这些数据支持电话调查能够充分描述农村低收入人群的能量和蛋白质摄入量。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验