Wang H H, Laffrey S C
College of Nursing, Kaohsiung Medical University, No. 100, Shih-Chuan 1st Rd., Kaohsiung 807, Taiwan.
Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2000 Sep;16(9):459-67.
The purpose of this study was to adapt and test the reliability and validity of the Personal Resource Questionnaire 85-Part 2 (PRQ85-Part 2) and Exercise of Self-Care Agency Scale (ESCA) for women in Taiwan. Using a 3-phase study, the instruments were first translated into Chinese, back translated into English, and examined for content validity. In the second phase, the Chinese versions of the instruments were administered to 30 women, aged 60 to 75 years, and 34 women, aged 22 to 38 years. Modifications were made in the wording of items to make them more meaningful for the older women. In phase three, the instruments were administered to 284 women, 60 to 88 years of age. Indices of content validity were 1.0 for both the PRQ85-Part 2 and ESCA. Alpha reliability coefficients ranged from .84 to .90 for the PRQ85-Part 2 and from .86 to .92 for the ESCA. A test-retest reliability coefficient after one week was .80 for the PRQ85-Part 2 and .91 for the ESCA. The findings of this study indicate that both instruments are culturally appropriate for use with women in Taiwan.
本研究旨在对个人资源问卷85第二部分（PRQ85 - 第二部分）和自我护理代理能力量表（ESCA）进行改编，并测试其在台湾女性中的信效度。采用三阶段研究，首先将这些工具翻译成中文，再回译成英文，并检验其内容效度。在第二阶段，将工具的中文版施用于30名年龄在60至75岁之间的女性和34名年龄在22至38岁之间的女性。对条目的措辞进行了修改，使其对老年女性更有意义。在第三阶段，将工具施用于284名年龄在60至88岁之间的女性。PRQ85 - 第二部分和ESCA的内容效度指标均为1.0。PRQ85 - 第二部分的α信度系数在0.84至0.90之间，ESCA的α信度系数在0.86至0.92之间。一周后的重测信度系数，PRQ85 - 第二部分为0.80，ESCA为0.91。本研究结果表明，这两种工具在文化上都适用于台湾女性。
