Corrigan J D
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2001 Feb;16(1):1-19. doi: 10.1097/00001199-200102000-00004.
The Traumatic Brain Injury Act of 1996 (Public Law 104-166) gave new authority to the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) in the United States Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) to establish a grant program for states to assist in addressing the needs of persons with traumatic brain injury (TBI). The resulting State Demonstration Grant Program has made available two categories of grants: planning and implementation. Planning grants are awarded to assist states in building infrastructure through the development of four core components. One of the core components is a statewide needs and resource assessment encompassing the full spectrum of services, from initial acute treatment through rehabilitation and long-term community supports. In 1999, assessments completed in 11 states were subjected to a comparative analysis to identify trends across states and to extract salient issues for the State Demonstration Grant Program. This article summarizes the context of the HRSA-funded needs assessments and contrasts the methods of needs assessment utilized. Over-arching issues are discussed, including exemplary qualitative and quantitative methods, and the diversity of theoretical models employed in designing assessments and interpreting findings. Several limitations in approaches were also identified, including shortcomings of convenience samples for conducting mail surveys and the unlikely validity of using a needs and resource discrepancy approach to identify gaps in services.
1996年《创伤性脑损伤法案》(公法104 - 166)赋予了美国卫生与公众服务部(DHHS)下属的卫生资源与服务管理局(HRSA)新的权力,以设立一项拨款计划,用于帮助各州满足创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者的需求。由此产生的州示范拨款计划提供了两类拨款:规划拨款和实施拨款。规划拨款旨在通过发展四个核心组成部分来协助各州建设基础设施。其中一个核心组成部分是涵盖从初始急性治疗到康复及长期社区支持等全方位服务的全州需求和资源评估。1999年,对11个州完成的评估进行了比较分析,以确定各州之间的趋势,并为州示范拨款计划提取突出问题。本文总结了由HRSA资助的需求评估的背景,并对比了所采用的需求评估方法。讨论了一些总体问题,包括典型的定性和定量方法,以及在设计评估和解释结果时所采用的各种理论模型。还指出了方法上的一些局限性,包括进行邮寄调查时便利样本的缺点,以及使用需求与资源差异方法来确定服务差距的有效性存疑。