Suppr超能文献

酗酒:加拿大酗酒治疗从业者的信念与态度

Alcoholism: beliefs and attitudes among Canadian alcoholism treatment practitioners.

作者信息

Meza E E, Cunningham J A, el-Guebaly N, Couper L

机构信息

Addiction Research Foundation Division, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario.

出版信息

Can J Psychiatry. 2001 Mar;46(2):167-72. doi: 10.1177/070674370104600209.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To explore differences in views concerning adjunctive medications and theoretical orientation among Canadian practitioners from different professional backgrounds who treat alcoholism.

METHODS

A survey of clinicians from different disciplines was conducted by mail. The response rate was 56%: 95 drug and alcohol counsellors, 46 social workers, 81 nonpsychiatrist addiction physicians, and 74 addiction psychiatrists. The number of items in the questionnaire was reduced using principal component analysis. Group differences were explored using analysis of variance with Bonferroni correction and Scheffé's posthoc comparisons.

RESULTS

Physicians and nonphysicians differed in their views on the utility of medications in treating alcohol problems, the disease concept of alcohol problems, and the classification of alcohol abuse or dependence as psychiatric conditions. No group differences emerged on views regarding cognitive-behavioural treatment, pharmacological-only interventions, combined treatment, and recovery without treatment. Psychopathology in the alcoholic was significantly more likely to be considered as secondary to the use of alcohol by nonpsychiatrist physicians. Nonphysician practitioners viewed alcoholic behaviour as self-medication.

CONCLUSIONS

Groups differed on questionnaire items concerning medication use and the disease concept of alcoholism. Agreement on several areas may facilitate bridging the gap across disciplines. The implications of these results are discussed.

摘要

目的

探讨加拿大不同专业背景的治疗酒精成瘾的从业者在辅助药物和理论取向方面的观点差异。

方法

通过邮件对不同学科的临床医生进行调查。回复率为56%:95名药物和酒精咨询师、46名社会工作者、81名非精神科成瘾医生和74名成瘾精神科医生。使用主成分分析减少问卷中的项目数量。使用方差分析及Bonferroni校正和Scheffé事后比较来探索组间差异。

结果

医生和非医生在药物治疗酒精问题的效用、酒精问题的疾病概念以及将酒精滥用或依赖归类为精神疾病方面存在观点差异。在认知行为治疗、仅药物干预、联合治疗和无需治疗的康复等观点上未出现组间差异。非精神科医生更有可能认为酗酒者的精神病理学是饮酒的继发结果。非医生从业者将酗酒行为视为自我用药。

结论

不同组在关于药物使用和酒精中毒疾病概念的问卷项目上存在差异。在几个领域达成共识可能有助于弥合各学科之间的差距。讨论了这些结果的意义。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验