Cabeza R, Rao S M, Wagner A D, Mayer A R, Schacter D L
Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Apr 10;98(8):4805-10. doi: 10.1073/pnas.081082698. Epub 2001 Apr 3.
To investigate the types of memory traces recovered by the medial temporal lobe (MTL), neural activity during veridical and illusory recognition was measured with the use of functional MRI (fMRI). Twelve healthy young adults watched a videotape segment in which two speakers alternatively presented lists of associated words, and then the subjects performed a recognition test including words presented in the study lists (True items), new words closely related to studied words (False items), and new unrelated words (New items). The main finding was a dissociation between two MTL regions: whereas the hippocampus was similarly activated for True and False items, suggesting the recovery of semantic information, the parahippocampal gyrus was more activated for True than for False items, suggesting the recovery of perceptual information. The study also yielded a dissociation between two prefrontal cortex (PFC) regions: whereas bilateral dorsolateral PFC was more activated for True and False items than for New items, possibly reflecting monitoring of retrieved information, left ventrolateral PFC was more activated for New than for True and False items, possibly reflecting semantic processing. Precuneus and lateral parietal regions were more activated for True and False than for New items. Orbitofrontal cortex and cerebellar regions were more activated for False than for True items. In conclusion, the results suggest that activity in anterior MTL regions does not distinguish True from False, whereas activity in posterior MTL regions does.
为了研究内侧颞叶(MTL)恢复的记忆痕迹类型,利用功能磁共振成像(fMRI)测量了真实识别和虚幻识别过程中的神经活动。12名健康的年轻成年人观看了一段录像片段,其中两名说话者交替呈现相关单词列表,然后受试者进行了一项识别测试,包括研究列表中呈现的单词(真实项目)、与所学单词密切相关的新单词(错误项目)和新的不相关单词(新项目)。主要发现是MTL的两个区域之间存在分离:海马体对真实项目和错误项目的激活相似,表明语义信息的恢复,而海马旁回对真实项目的激活比对错误项目更强,表明知觉信息的恢复。该研究还发现前额叶皮层(PFC)的两个区域之间存在分离:双侧背外侧PFC对真实项目和错误项目的激活比对新项目更强,可能反映了对检索信息的监测,左侧腹外侧PFC对新项目的激活比对真实项目和错误项目更强,可能反映了语义加工。楔前叶和顶叶外侧区域对真实项目和错误项目的激活比对新项目更强。眶额皮层和小脑区域对错误项目的激活比对真实项目更强。总之,结果表明MTL前部区域的活动无法区分真实和错误,而MTL后部区域的活动则可以。