Ferreira F, Christianson K, Hollingworth A
Department of Linguistics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824, USA.
J Psycholinguist Res. 2001 Jan;30(1):3-20. doi: 10.1023/a:1005290706460.
Theories of sentence comprehension have addressed both initial parsing processes and mechanisms responsible for reanalysis. Three experiments are summarized that were designed to investigate the reanalysis and interpretation of relatively difficult garden-path sentences (e.g., While Anna dressed the baby spit up on the bed). After reading such sentences, participants correctly believed that the baby spit up on the bed; however, they often confidently, yet incorrectly, believed that Anna dressed the baby. These results demonstrate that garden-path reanalysis is not an all-or-nothing process and that thematic roles initially assigned for the subordinate clause verb are not consistently revised. The implications of the partial reanalysis phenomenon for Fodor and Inoue's (1998) model of reanalysis and sentence processing are discussed. In addition, we discuss the possibility that language processing often creates "good enough" structures rather than ideal structures.
句子理解理论既涉及初始解析过程,也涉及负责重新分析的机制。总结了三个实验,这些实验旨在研究相对较难的花园路径句子(例如,当安娜给婴儿穿衣服时,婴儿在床上吐奶了)的重新分析和解释。读完这样的句子后,参与者正确地认为婴儿在床上吐奶了;然而,他们常常自信但错误地认为安娜给婴儿穿衣服了。这些结果表明,花园路径重新分析不是一个全有或全无的过程,并且最初为从属子句动词分配的主题角色并没有得到一致的修正。讨论了部分重新分析现象对福多尔和井上(1998)的重新分析和句子处理模型的影响。此外,我们还讨论了语言处理常常创造出“足够好”的结构而非理想结构的可能性。