Rayner K, Garrod S, Perfetti C A
Department of Psychology, University of Massachusetts, Amherst 01003.
Cognition. 1992 Nov;45(2):109-39. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(92)90026-e.
Subjects read sentences containing either a syntactically ambiguous prepositional phrase attachment or a syntactically ambiguous reduced relative clause. The sentences were embedded in passages of text that were consistent with either the minimal or non-minimal attachment reading. In addition, a discourse factor (i.e., whether or not the target sentence was in the discourse focus) was varied. Subjects' eye movements were recorded as they read the passages of text. Our primary finding was that subjects were garden-pathed even when there was biasing context. However, when the target sentence was in the discourse focus, subjects were able to recover more readily from their initial erroneous parse of the sentence. The data thus support models of sentence parsing that postulate that the parsing of a sentence is based upon structurally based principles and the influence of semantic or pragmatic information makes itself felt only after the initial parsing decision has been made.
受试者阅读包含句法歧义介词短语附着或句法歧义简化关系从句的句子。这些句子被嵌入到与最小附着或非最小附着解读相一致的文本段落中。此外,一个语篇因素(即目标句子是否处于语篇焦点)也有所变化。当受试者阅读文本段落时,他们的眼动被记录下来。我们的主要发现是,即使存在偏向性语境,受试者也会被误导。然而,当目标句子处于语篇焦点时,受试者能够更容易地从最初对句子的错误解析中恢复过来。因此,这些数据支持句子解析模型,该模型假定句子解析基于结构原则,并且语义或语用信息的影响仅在做出初始解析决定之后才会显现出来。