Whitehurst M, Brown L E, Eidelson S G, D'angelo A
Department of Health Sciences, Florida Atlantic University, Davie, FL 33314, USA.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001 Apr;82(4):464-7. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2001.20828.
To compare the functional mobility (FM) of elderly apparently healthy (AH) subjects and patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) and to evaluate the reliability and validity of the FM tests.
Using the test-retest paradigm, FM performance was assessed in AH subjects. A single FM assessment was conducted on a group of LSS subjects. Between-group performance comparisons were made with the AH subjects and the LSS patients.
Orthopedic clinical practice (LSS subjects) and university laboratory (AH subjects).
Fifty-seven patients seen in an orthopedic clinical practice for LSS and 96 AH subjects who were volunteers identified from among participants of The Lifelong Learning Society at Florida Atlantic University.
Treadmill walk (TW) test (at 53.6 m/min, 1% increase in grade per min) until 70% of the predicted maximum heart rate was achieved or associated pain made participation uncomfortable. Three trials each of a sit-to-stand (SS, rise from chair as quickly as possible without using arms) and a weight-carrying (WC, walk 20 m as quickly as possible for time carrying 10% of the body weight evenly distributed in hand-held weights) test. The AH group repeated all tests on a separate day.
Time to walk treadmill, stand from sitting position, walk 20 meters, and analysis of variance between groups.
Significant between-group differences were found for the TW, SS, and WC tests. Test-retest r values of .839 for the TW, .848 for the SS, and .833 for the WC were observed.
The AH group demonstrated greater FM than the LSS group. The performance disparity between groups may suggest context validity, while the AH groups test-retest stability reflects reliability.
比较明显健康的老年受试者(AH)和腰椎管狭窄症(LSS)患者的功能活动能力(FM),并评估FM测试的可靠性和有效性。
采用重测范式,对AH受试者的FM表现进行评估。对一组LSS受试者进行单次FM评估。对AH受试者和LSS患者进行组间表现比较。
骨科临床实践(LSS受试者)和大学实验室(AH受试者)。
57名因LSS在骨科临床实践中就诊的患者,以及96名AH受试者,这些受试者是从佛罗里达大西洋大学终身学习协会的参与者中招募的志愿者。
跑步机步行(TW)测试(速度为53.6米/分钟,坡度每分钟增加1%),直到达到预测最大心率的70%或相关疼痛使参与感到不适。进行三次从坐到站(SS,不使用手臂尽可能快地从椅子上起身)和负重(WC,手持均匀分布体重10%的重物尽可能快地行走20米)测试。AH组在另一天重复所有测试。
跑步机步行时间、从坐姿站起时间、行走20米时间以及组间方差分析。
TW、SS和WC测试在组间存在显著差异。观察到TW的重测r值为0.839,SS为0.848,WC为0.833。
AH组的FM高于LSS组。组间表现差异可能表明内容效度,而AH组的重测稳定性反映了可靠性。