Hellard M E, Sinclair M I, Forbes A B, Fairley C K
Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Cooperative Research Centre for Water Quality and Treatment, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2001 May;55(5):348-51. doi: 10.1136/jech.55.5.348.
To describe the strategies adopted to maintain high level participation throughout a community based clinical trial, and the reasons given by participants for why they participated in the study.
Observational study.
Community based clinical trial in Melbourne, Australia that ran for 68 weeks and involved 2811 community based individuals from 600 families. A high level of commitment was required of the families; each participant completed a Health Diary each week of the 68 week study, as well as answering numerous other questionnaires, and providing faecal and blood samples.
Only 41 of the 600 families withdrew from the study; the majority of these families withdrew because they sold their home and moved from the study area. The completion rate of Health Diaries averaged 90.7% over the 68 weeks of data collection. Of the 559 families who completed the study, 524 (93.7%) completed the Participation Questionnaire. The statement that received the highest rating for why families enrolled in the study was they thought the study was researching an important community issue. The statements that received the highest ratings for why families continued to participate in the study was the family being kept well informed about the study's progress and that the study was well run.
The low numbers of withdrawals and the high level of participation throughout the study suggests the strategies of (a) having a non-aggressive recruitment method, (b) maintaining regular contact with the participants and (c) ensuring participants were kept well informed of the study's progress and constantly encouraged to continue participation were successful. The results also suggest people involve themselves in research because they perceive it to be of value to the community, not simply for personal gain. They indicated that they maintained their participation because it was a well run study and they were kept well informed throughout the study.
描述在一项基于社区的临床试验中为保持高水平参与所采用的策略,以及参与者给出的参与该研究的原因。
观察性研究。
在澳大利亚墨尔本进行的一项基于社区的临床试验,为期68周,涉及来自600个家庭的2811名社区成员。要求家庭有高度的参与度;在为期68周的研究中,每位参与者每周都要完成一份健康日记,还要回答许多其他问卷,并提供粪便和血液样本。
600个家庭中只有41个退出了研究;这些家庭中的大多数退出是因为他们卖掉了房子并搬离了研究区域。在68周的数据收集期间,健康日记的完成率平均为90.7%。在完成研究的559个家庭中,524个(93.7%)完成了参与调查问卷。对于家庭参与研究的原因,得分最高的陈述是他们认为该研究正在研究一个重要的社区问题。对于家庭继续参与研究的原因,得分最高的陈述是家庭充分了解研究进展且研究开展得很好。
研究期间退出人数少且参与度高,这表明以下策略是成功的:(a)采用非激进的招募方法,(b)与参与者保持定期联系,(c)确保参与者充分了解研究进展并不断鼓励他们继续参与。结果还表明,人们参与研究是因为他们认为这对社区有价值,而不仅仅是为了个人利益。他们表示继续参与是因为这是一项开展良好的研究,并且在整个研究过程中他们都充分了解情况。