Suppr超能文献

验证老年人急性心肌梗死后冠状动脉造影检查的推荐意见:一项使用倾向评分的匹配分析。

Validating recommendations for coronary angiography following acute myocardial infarction in the elderly: a matched analysis using propensity scores.

作者信息

Normand S T, Landrum M B, Guadagnoli E, Ayanian J Z, Ryan T J, Cleary P D, McNeil B J

机构信息

Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115-5899, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Epidemiol. 2001 Apr;54(4):387-98. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(00)00321-8.

Abstract

We determined whether adherence to recommendations for coronary angiography more than 12 h after symptom onset but prior to hospital discharge after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) resulted in better survival. Using propensity scores, we created a matched retrospective sample of 19,568 Medicare patients hospitalized with AMI during 1994-1995 in the United States. Twenty-nine percent, 36%, and 34% of patients were judged necessary, appropriate, or uncertain, respectively, for angiography while 60% of those judged necessary received the procedure during the hospitalization. The 3-year survival benefit was largest for patients rated necessary [mean survival difference (95% CI): 17.6% (15.1, 20.1)] and smallest for those rated uncertain [8.8% (6.8, 10.7)]. Angiography recommendations appear to select patients who are likely to benefit from the procedure and the consequent interventions. Because of the magnitude of the benefit and of the number of patients involved, steps should be taken to replicate these findings.

摘要

我们确定了在急性心肌梗死(AMI)症状发作后12小时以上但在出院前进行冠状动脉造影的建议是否能带来更好的生存率。利用倾向评分,我们在美国创建了一个1994 - 1995年期间因AMI住院的19568名医疗保险患者的匹配回顾性样本。分别有29%、36%和34%的患者被判定进行血管造影是必要的、合适的或不确定的,而在那些被判定为必要的患者中,有60%在住院期间接受了该检查。对于被评定为必要的患者,3年生存获益最大[平均生存差异(95%CI):17.6%(15.1,20.1)],而对于被评定为不确定的患者,生存获益最小[8.8%(6.8,10.7)]。血管造影建议似乎筛选出了可能从该检查及后续干预中获益的患者。鉴于获益程度和涉及的患者数量,应采取措施重复这些研究结果。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验