• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

尝试一切的必要性:患者参与I期试验。

A need to try everything: patient participation in phase I trials.

作者信息

Moore S

机构信息

The Centre for Cancer and Palliative Care Studies, Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, Surrey, UK.

出版信息

J Adv Nurs. 2001 Mar;33(6):738-47. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2001.01715.x.

DOI:10.1046/j.1365-2648.2001.01715.x
PMID:11298211
Abstract

RATIONALE

The area of phase I trials is fraught with ethical dilemmas and controversy. Most existing research focuses on issues of human rights and the informed consent procedure. Little attention has been given to patients' perceptions of participating in such trials.

DESIGN

This paper describes a study using qualitative interviews and open-stem questionnaires to begin to explore patients' own perceptions of any benefits from participating in phase I trials.

RESULTS

Findings suggest that for some patients, phase I trials fulfil a need to try everything in their fight against cancer. The study also suggests that being on treatment allows some patients to construct their lives meaningfully by providing a supportive structure and enabling hope. Implications for nursing practice and further research are discussed.

摘要

理论依据

一期试验领域充满了伦理困境和争议。现有的大多数研究都集中在人权问题和知情同意程序上。很少有人关注患者对参与此类试验的看法。

设计

本文描述了一项研究,该研究使用定性访谈和开放式问卷来初步探索患者对参与一期试验所获益处的自身看法。

结果

研究结果表明,对一些患者来说,一期试验满足了他们在抗癌斗争中尝试一切的需求。该研究还表明,接受治疗能为一些患者提供支持性结构并带来希望,从而使他们能够有意义地构建自己的生活。文中讨论了对护理实践和进一步研究的启示。

相似文献

1
A need to try everything: patient participation in phase I trials.尝试一切的必要性:患者参与I期试验。
J Adv Nurs. 2001 Mar;33(6):738-47. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2001.01715.x.
2
Study of cohort-specific consent and patient control in phase I cancer trials.I期癌症试验中特定队列同意和患者控制的研究。
J Clin Oncol. 1998 Jul;16(7):2305-12. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1998.16.7.2305.
3
Understanding how coping strategies and quality of life maintain hope in patients deliberating phase I trial participation.了解应对策略和生活质量如何维持正在考虑参加 I 期临床试验的患者的希望。
Psychooncology. 2018 Jan;27(1):163-170. doi: 10.1002/pon.4487. Epub 2017 Jul 26.
4
Perceptions of cancer patients and their physicians involved in phase I trials.参与I期试验的癌症患者及其医生的看法。
J Clin Oncol. 1995 May;13(5):1062-72. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1995.13.5.1062.
5
Cancer patients' perceptions of factors influencing their decisions on participation in clinical drug trials: A qualitative meta-synthesis.癌症患者对影响其参与临床药物试验决策因素的看法:定性荟萃分析。
J Clin Nurs. 2019 Jul;28(13-14):2443-2461. doi: 10.1111/jocn.14785. Epub 2019 Mar 3.
6
Phase I cancer trials. A collusion of misunderstanding.I期癌症试验。误解的交织。
Hastings Cent Rep. 2000 Jul-Aug;30(4):34-43.
7
Hope for a cure and altruism are the main motives behind participation in phase 3 clinical cancer trials.对治愈的希望和利他主义是参与癌症三期临床试验背后的主要动机。
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2015;24(1):133-41. doi: 10.1111/ecc.12184. Epub 2014 Jan 28.
8
Reasons given by patients for participating, or not, in Phase 1 cancer trials.患者参与或不参与 1 期癌症试验的原因。
Eur J Cancer. 2011 Jul;47(10):1490-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2011.02.020. Epub 2011 Mar 30.
9
Enhancing cancer clinical trial management: recommendations from a qualitative study of trial participants' experiences.加强癌症临床试验管理:来自对试验参与者经历的定性研究的建议
Psychooncology. 2000 Jul-Aug;9(4):314-22. doi: 10.1002/1099-1611(200007/08)9:4<314::aid-pon464>3.0.co;2-c.
10
Proposing phase I studies: patients', relatives', nurses' and specialists' perceptions.
Ann Oncol. 2000 Mar;11(3):289-94. doi: 10.1023/a:1008393031299.

引用本文的文献

1
Our clock is truly ticking-a qualitative study on patients' experiences of tumor treating fields.我们的时间确实在流逝——一项关于患者肿瘤治疗电场体验的定性研究。
Neurooncol Pract. 2024 Oct 28;12(2):325-332. doi: 10.1093/nop/npae102. eCollection 2025 Apr.
2
Patient, Relative and Staff Experiences of Clinical Trial Participation in Neurooncology: "Maybe You Can Also Show the Positive, No Matter How It Ends".神经肿瘤学临床试验中患者、家属及工作人员的参与体验:“无论结局如何,或许你也能展现积极的一面”
Cancer Manag Res. 2024 Jun 21;16:663-676. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S447407. eCollection 2024.
3
"If only I had", patients' experiences during early oncology trials.
如果我有,患者在肿瘤早期临床试验中的经历。
Support Care Cancer. 2023 Apr 21;31(5):290. doi: 10.1007/s00520-023-07738-y.
4
Hope and meaning-making in phase 1 oncology trials: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative evidence on patient-participant experiences.希望与意义的探索:一项对肿瘤学 I 期临床试验中患者体验的定性研究的系统综述和主题综合分析。
Trials. 2022 May 16;23(1):409. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06306-9.
5
Patients' experiences of the decision-making process for clinical trial participation.患者参与临床试验决策过程的体验。
Nurs Health Sci. 2022 Mar;24(1):65-72. doi: 10.1111/nhs.12933. Epub 2022 Mar 21.
6
Oncology patients' experiences in experimental medicine cancer trials: a qualitative study.肿瘤患者参与实验性医学癌症试验的体验:一项定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 Oct 5;11(10):e047813. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047813.
7
Do the Potential Medical Benefits of Phase 1 Pediatric Oncology Trials Justify the Risks? Views of the United States Public.一期儿科肿瘤试验的潜在医学益处是否能证明其风险合理?美国公众的观点。
J Pediatr. 2021 Nov;238:249-258.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2021.06.009. Epub 2021 Jun 16.
8
Participant Attitudes Toward an Intensive Trial of Multiple Biopsies, Multidimensional Molecular Analysis, and Reporting of Results in Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.转移性三阴性乳腺癌患者对多次活检、多维分子分析及结果报告强化试验的态度
JCO Precis Oncol. 2017 Aug 16;1. doi: 10.1200/PO.17.00076. eCollection 2017.
9
Well-Being of Child and Family Participants in Phase 1 Pediatric Oncology Clinical Trials.参与1期儿科肿瘤临床试验的儿童及家庭受试者的健康状况
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2018 Sep 1;45(5):E67-E97. doi: 10.1188/18.ONF.E67-E97.
10
Understanding Treatment Burden and Quality of Life Impact of Participating in an Early-Phase Pediatric Oncology Clinical Trial: A Pilot Study.了解参与早期儿科肿瘤临床试验的治疗负担和生活质量影响:一项试点研究。
J Pediatr Oncol Nurs. 2018 Jan/Feb;35(1):25-35. doi: 10.1177/1043454217723863. Epub 2017 Aug 29.