• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者参与或不参与 1 期癌症试验的原因。

Reasons given by patients for participating, or not, in Phase 1 cancer trials.

机构信息

CR-UK Psychosocial Oncology Group, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, UK.

出版信息

Eur J Cancer. 2011 Jul;47(10):1490-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2011.02.020. Epub 2011 Mar 30.

DOI:10.1016/j.ejca.2011.02.020
PMID:21454072
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Communication with patients contemplating Phase 1 cancer trial participation can be challenging. Controversy exists as to whether they are provided with sufficient information to give genuinely informed consent. We present data examining the reasons patients gave for trial entry.

METHOD

Following discussions with oncologists about Phase 1 trials, participants completed a 19-item study specific 'accept or decline measure' exploring hope, expectations of benefit, altruism, concerns, and general perceptions of the trial information. They also completed 2 standardised questionnaires measuring psychological morbidity and predisposition towards optimism.

RESULTS

Forty patients completed the study questionnaires. Patients were generally optimistic with few concerns about the experimental nature of Phase 1 trials. Most 36/40 (90%) consented to trial entry. Fifty-one percent thought the trial was the only treatment option available. The four main reasons for trial entry were: expectation of some medical benefit (21%); trial the best available option (21%); to maintain hope (15%) and to help with research (13%). Only one patient gave altruism as their main reason for trial participation.

CONCLUSION

Patients considering Phase 1 trials may be a self-selected group with optimistic expectations of personal benefit driving trial entry rather than altruism. Achieving genuinely informed consent and avoidance of therapeutic misconceptions in such patients may be difficult.

摘要

背景

与考虑参加 1 期癌症试验的患者进行沟通可能具有挑战性。关于他们是否获得了真正知情同意所需的充分信息,存在争议。我们提供的数据检查了患者选择参加试验的原因。

方法

在与肿瘤学家讨论 1 期试验后,参与者完成了一份 19 项特定于研究的“接受或拒绝措施”,其中探讨了希望、获益期望、利他主义、担忧以及对试验信息的总体看法。他们还完成了 2 项衡量心理病态和对乐观倾向的标准化问卷。

结果

40 名患者完成了研究问卷。患者通常持乐观态度,对 1 期试验的实验性质几乎没有担忧。40/40(100%)名患者同意参加试验。51%的患者认为试验是唯一可选择的治疗方案。参加试验的四个主要原因是:预期有一定的医疗获益(21%);试验是最佳可用选项(21%);保持希望(15%)和帮助研究(13%)。只有 1 名患者将利他主义作为参加试验的主要原因。

结论

考虑参加 1 期试验的患者可能是一个自我选择的群体,他们对个人获益的乐观期望驱动了试验参与,而不是利他主义。在这些患者中实现真正的知情同意并避免治疗误解可能很困难。

相似文献

1
Reasons given by patients for participating, or not, in Phase 1 cancer trials.患者参与或不参与 1 期癌症试验的原因。
Eur J Cancer. 2011 Jul;47(10):1490-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2011.02.020. Epub 2011 Mar 30.
2
Hope for a cure and altruism are the main motives behind participation in phase 3 clinical cancer trials.对治愈的希望和利他主义是参与癌症三期临床试验背后的主要动机。
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2015;24(1):133-41. doi: 10.1111/ecc.12184. Epub 2014 Jan 28.
3
Study of cohort-specific consent and patient control in phase I cancer trials.I期癌症试验中特定队列同意和患者控制的研究。
J Clin Oncol. 1998 Jul;16(7):2305-12. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1998.16.7.2305.
4
What oncologists believe they said and what patients believe they heard: an analysis of phase I trial discussions.肿瘤学家认为他们说了什么和患者认为他们听到了什么:I 期临床试验讨论分析。
J Clin Oncol. 2011 Jan 1;29(1):61-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.30.0814. Epub 2010 Nov 22.
5
Perceptions of cancer patients and their physicians involved in phase I trials.参与I期试验的癌症患者及其医生的看法。
J Clin Oncol. 1995 May;13(5):1062-72. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1995.13.5.1062.
6
Communication about the risks and benefits of phase I pediatric oncology trials.关于儿科肿瘤I期试验风险与益处的沟通。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2015 Mar;41:139-45. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2015.01.015. Epub 2015 Jan 29.
7
Drivers and barriers to patient participation in RCTs.患者参与 RCT 的驱动因素和障碍。
Br J Cancer. 2013 Apr 16;108(7):1402-7. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2013.113. Epub 2013 Mar 19.
8
Phase I trials in pediatric oncology: perceptions of pediatricians from the United Kingdom Children's Cancer Study Group and the Pediatric Oncology Group.儿科肿瘤学的I期试验:来自英国儿童癌症研究组和儿科肿瘤学组的儿科医生的看法。
J Clin Oncol. 2000 May;18(9):1900-5. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2000.18.9.1900.
9
Expectations and experiences of patients with cancer participating in phase I clinical trials.参与I期临床试验的癌症患者的期望与体验。
Oncol Nurs Forum. 1997 Jun;24(5):891-6.
10
A need to try everything: patient participation in phase I trials.尝试一切的必要性:患者参与I期试验。
J Adv Nurs. 2001 Mar;33(6):738-47. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2001.01715.x.

引用本文的文献

1
The dual role of empathy in clinical trial decisions.同理心在临床试验决策中的双重作用。
Front Psychol. 2025 Mar 19;16:1397581. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1397581. eCollection 2025.
2
Unveiling Disparities: Analyzing Hispanic Inclusion in Liver Cancer Research Databases in the United States.揭示差异:分析美国肝癌研究数据库中西班牙裔群体的纳入情况
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2024 Sep 23. doi: 10.1007/s40615-024-02178-8.
3
Exploring the barriers to, and importance of, participant diversity in early-phase clinical trials: an interview-based qualitative study of professionals and patient and public representatives.
探索早期临床试验中参与者多样性的障碍和重要性:基于访谈的专业人员、患者和公众代表的定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2024 Mar 19;14(3):e075547. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075547.
4
Characteristics of Early Phase Clinical Trials for Rare Cancers: Insights From Interviews With Stakeholders.罕见癌症早期临床试验的特点:来自与利益相关者访谈的见解
Front Pharmacol. 2022 May 2;13:775217. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.775217. eCollection 2022.
5
Equitable Representation of Latinos in Clinical Research Is Needed to Achieve Health Equity in Cancer Care.需要在临床研究中公平代表拉丁裔,以实现癌症护理中的健康公平。
JCO Oncol Pract. 2022 May;18(5):e797-e804. doi: 10.1200/OP.22.00127.
6
Reasons for acceptance and refusal of early palliative care in patients included in early-phase clinical trials in a regional comprehensive cancer centre in France: protocol for a qualitative study.法国某地区综合性癌症中心早期临床试验纳入患者对早期姑息治疗接受和拒绝的原因:一项定性研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Apr 22;12(4):e060317. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060317.
7
Decisional Conflict after Deciding on Potential Participation in Early Phase Clinical Cancer Trials: Dependent on Global Health Status, Satisfaction with Communication, and Timing.决定是否参与早期癌症临床试验后的决策冲突:取决于总体健康状况、对沟通的满意度以及时间安排。
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Mar 15;14(6):1500. doi: 10.3390/cancers14061500.
8
Recruiting general practitioners and patients with dementia into a cluster randomised controlled trial: strategies, barriers and facilitators.招募全科医生和痴呆症患者参与一项整群随机对照试验:策略、障碍和促进因素。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2021 Mar 30;21(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s12874-021-01253-6.
9
Deciding to Enrol in a Cancer Trial: A Systematic Review of Qualitative Studies.决定参加癌症试验:定性研究的系统评价
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2020 Oct 27;13:1257-1281. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S266281. eCollection 2020.
10
Are cancer patients better off if they participate in clinical trials? A mixed methods study.癌症患者参与临床试验是否获益更多?一项混合方法研究。
BMC Cancer. 2020 May 8;20(1):401. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-06916-z.