• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

大脑语言中的词汇。

Words in the brain's language.

作者信息

Pulvermüller F

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Konstanz, 78434 Konstanz, Germany.

出版信息

Behav Brain Sci. 1999 Apr;22(2):253-79; discussion 280-336.

PMID:11301524
Abstract

If the cortex is an associative memory, strongly connected cell assemblies will form when neurons in different cortical areas are frequently active at the same time. The cortical distributions of these assemblies must be a consequence of where in the cortex correlated neuronal activity occurred during learning. An assembly can be considered a functional unit exhibiting activity states such as full activation ("ignition") after appropriate sensory stimulation (possibly related to perception) and continuous reverberation of excitation within the assembly (a putative memory process). This has implications for cortical topographies and activity dynamics of cell assemblies forming during language acquisition, in particular for those representing words. Cortical topographies of assemblies should be related to aspects of the meaning of the words they represent, and physiological signs of cell assembly ignition should be followed by possible indicators of reverberation. The following postulates are discussed in detail: (1) assemblies representing phonological word forms are strongly lateralized and distributed over perisylvian cortices; (2) assemblies representing highly abstract words such as grammatical function words are also strongly lateralized and restricted to these perisylvian regions; (3) assemblies representing concrete content words include additional neurons in both hemispheres; (4) assemblies representing words referring to visual stimuli include neurons in visual cortices; and (5) assemblies representing words referring to actions include neurons in motor cortices. Two main sources of evidence are used to evaluate these proposals: (a) imaging studies focusing on localizing word processing in the brain, based on stimulus-triggered event-related potentials (ERPs), positron emission tomography (PET), and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), and (b) studies of the temporal dynamics of fast activity changes in the brain, as revealed by high-frequency responses recorded in the electroencephalogram (EEG) and magnetoencephalogram (MEG). These data provide evidence for processing differences between words and matched meaningless pseudowords, and between word classes, such as concrete content and abstract function words, and words evoking visual or motor associations. There is evidence for early word class-specific spreading of neuronal activity and for equally specific high-frequency responses occurring later. These results support a neurobiological model of language in the Hebbian tradition. Competing large-scale neuronal theories of language are discussed in light of the data summarized. Neurobiological perspectives on the problem of serial order of words in syntactic strings are considered in closing.

摘要

如果皮质是一个联想记忆体,那么当不同皮质区域的神经元频繁同时活跃时,就会形成强连接的细胞集合体。这些集合体在皮质中的分布必定是学习过程中皮质内相关神经元活动发生位置的结果。一个集合体可被视为一个功能单元,它展现出诸如在适当的感觉刺激(可能与感知有关)后完全激活(“点火”)以及集合体内兴奋的持续回响(一种假定的记忆过程)等活动状态。这对语言习得过程中形成的细胞集合体的皮质拓扑结构和活动动态有影响,特别是对于那些代表单词的集合体。集合体的皮质拓扑结构应与它们所代表单词的意义方面相关,并且细胞集合体点火的生理迹象之后应伴随着回响的可能指标。以下假设将被详细讨论:(1)代表语音单词形式的集合体强烈偏向一侧并分布在颞周皮质上;(2)代表诸如语法功能词等高度抽象单词的集合体也强烈偏向一侧并局限于这些颞周区域;(3)代表具体实词的集合体在两个半球中都包含额外的神经元;(4)代表指视觉刺激的单词的集合体包括视觉皮质中的神经元;(5)代表指动作的单词的集合体包括运动皮质中的神经元。有两个主要证据来源用于评估这些提议:(a)基于刺激触发的事件相关电位(ERP)、正电子发射断层扫描(PET)和功能磁共振成像(fMRI),聚焦于在大脑中定位单词处理的成像研究,以及(b)脑电图(EEG)和脑磁图(MEG)记录的高频响应所揭示的大脑中快速活动变化的时间动态研究。这些数据为单词与匹配的无意义假词之间以及单词类别(如具体实词和抽象功能词)之间,以及唤起视觉或运动联想的单词之间的处理差异提供了证据。有证据表明神经元活动存在早期的单词类别特异性传播,以及后期同样特异性的高频响应。这些结果支持了赫布传统下的语言神经生物学模型。根据总结的数据讨论了相互竞争的大规模语言神经元理论。最后考虑了关于句法字符串中单词顺序问题的神经生物学观点。

相似文献

1
Words in the brain's language.大脑语言中的词汇。
Behav Brain Sci. 1999 Apr;22(2):253-79; discussion 280-336.
2
Nouns and verbs in the intact brain: evidence from event-related potentials and high-frequency cortical responses.完整大脑中的名词和动词:来自事件相关电位和高频皮层反应的证据。
Cereb Cortex. 1999 Jul-Aug;9(5):497-506. doi: 10.1093/cercor/9.5.497.
3
From orthography to phonetics: ERP measures of grapheme-to-phoneme conversion mechanisms in reading.从正字法到语音学:阅读中字形到音素转换机制的事件相关电位测量
J Cogn Neurosci. 2004 Mar;16(2):301-17. doi: 10.1162/089892904322984580.
4
Brain signatures of meaning access in action word recognition.动作词识别中意义通达的脑信号特征
J Cogn Neurosci. 2005 Jun;17(6):884-92. doi: 10.1162/0898929054021111.
5
The concept of transcortical cell assemblies: a key to the understanding of cortical lateralization and interhemispheric interaction.
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 1996 Winter;20(4):557-66. doi: 10.1016/0149-7634(95)00068-2.
6
Electrocortical distinction of vocabulary types.
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1995 May;94(5):357-70. doi: 10.1016/0013-4694(94)00291-r.
7
Localization of electrophysiological responses to semantic and syntactic anomalies in language comprehension with MEG.使用 MEG 定位语言理解中语义和句法异常的电生理反应。
Neuroimage. 2015 Jan 15;105:507-24. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.11.016. Epub 2014 Nov 14.
8
High-frequency cortical responses reflect lexical processing: an MEG study.高频皮层反应反映词汇加工:一项脑磁图研究。
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1996 Jan;98(1):76-85. doi: 10.1016/0013-4694(95)00191-3.
9
Identification of language-specific brain activity using magnetoencephalography.利用脑磁图识别特定语言的大脑活动。
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1998 Oct;20(5):706-22. doi: 10.1076/jcen.20.5.706.1127.
10
N400-like magnetoencephalography responses modulated by semantic context, word frequency, and lexical class in sentences.句子中受语义语境、词频和词汇类别调制的类N400脑磁图反应
Neuroimage. 2002 Nov;17(3):1101-16. doi: 10.1006/nimg.2002.1268.

引用本文的文献

1
Inner speech in motor cortex and implications for speech neuroprostheses.运动皮层中的内部言语及其对言语神经假体的意义。
Cell. 2025 Jul 9. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2025.06.015.
2
Co-activation of phonological and orthographic codes in various modalities of language processing: A systematic and meta-analytic review.语言处理各种模态中语音和正字法代码的共同激活:一项系统的元分析综述。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2025 Jul 3. doi: 10.3758/s13423-025-02718-1.
3
Experientially-grounded and distributional semantic vectors uncover dissociable representations of conceptual categories.
基于经验和分布语义的向量揭示了概念类别的可分离表征。
Lang Cogn Neurosci. 2023 Jul 12;39(8):1020-1044. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2023.2232481. eCollection 2024.
4
On the ability of standard and brain-constrained deep neural networks to support cognitive superposition: a position paper.论标准和脑约束深度神经网络支持认知叠加的能力:一篇立场文件。
Cogn Neurodyn. 2024 Dec;18(6):3383-3400. doi: 10.1007/s11571-023-10061-1. Epub 2024 Feb 4.
5
Semantic Memory, Traumatic Brain Injury, and the Iceberg Effect: What Deficits May Lie Below the Surface?语义记忆、创伤性脑损伤与冰山效应:表面之下可能存在哪些缺陷?
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2025 Jun 26;34(3S):1878-1895. doi: 10.1044/2024_AJSLP-24-00145. Epub 2024 Dec 3.
6
Is frontal EEG gamma power a neural correlate of language in toddlerhood? An examination of late talking and expressive language ability.婴幼儿时期额部 EEG 伽马功率是否是语言的神经相关物?对晚说话和表达性语言能力的考察。
Brain Lang. 2024 Oct;257:105462. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2024.105462. Epub 2024 Oct 1.
7
The Neural Correlates of Embodied L2 Learning: Does Embodied L2 Verb Learning Affect Representation and Retention?具身第二语言学习的神经关联:具身第二语言动词学习会影响表征和记忆吗?
Neurobiol Lang (Camb). 2024 Jun 3;5(2):360-384. doi: 10.1162/nol_a_00132. eCollection 2024.
8
The primacy of experience in language processing: Semantic priming is driven primarily by experiential similarity.经验在语言处理中的首要地位:语义启动主要是由经验相似性驱动的。
Neuropsychologia. 2024 Aug 13;201:108939. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2024.108939. Epub 2024 Jun 18.
9
How does the "default mode" network contribute to semantic cognition?“默认模式”网络如何促进语义认知?
Brain Lang. 2024 May;252:105405. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2024.105405. Epub 2024 Apr 4.
10
Predictive Brain Activity Shows Congruent Semantic Specificity in Language Comprehension and Production.预测性脑活动在语言理解和产生中表现出一致的语义特异性。
J Neurosci. 2024 Mar 20;44(12):e1723232023. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1723-23.2023.