Cram P, Blitz S G, Monto A, Fendrick A M
Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Pharmacoeconomics. 2001;19(3):223-30. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200119030-00001.
Influenza infection has been a burden to humans for thousands of years. Despite the fact that epidemics could be predicted with regularity, the lack of available prevention or treatment measures left humankind vulnerable to the harmful effects of this ubiquitous virus. While the pandemics of 1918 and 1957 are recent examples of the devastation that influenza may inflict, even in a typical year influenza infection and related complications cause significant morbidity and mortality. The development of an influenza vaccine during the 1940s marked a major turning point in the management of this disease. Vaccination of the elderly and other high risk patients has been shown to reduce morbidity and mortality and to be a worthwhile investment from an economic perspective. Despite these benefits, vaccine use in this group remains suboptimal. The role of annual vaccination for individuals at lower risk for influenza-related complications remains controversial. While prevention by vaccination is relatively straightforward, the treatment of symptomatic influenza-like illness with medication is more complicated. Differentiating symptoms caused by the influenza viruses from those caused by other common viruses is difficult. Currently available tests to document influenza as the cause of illness are either too expensive, too inaccurate or too time consuming to impact treatment. Symptom-based diagnosis remains the most commonly used strategy in clinical practice. The approval of the neuraminidase inhibitors (NIs)--zanamivir and oseltamivir--remind healthcare providers of the difficulties in diagnosing and treating influenza. NIs have been shown to reduce the duration of symptoms of individuals infected with influenza when prescribed within the first 2 days of symptoms. Whether these innovative agents are cost effective, however, requires a more detailed understanding of the benefits that these agents may offer above and beyond existing therapies. In this review, we examine the burden of influenza infection, diagnostic challenges and the clinical and economic impact of available interventions. Clinical controversies and potential areas for further investigation are also explored.
数千年来,流感感染一直是人类的负担。尽管疫情可以定期预测,但由于缺乏有效的预防或治疗措施,人类一直易受这种无处不在的病毒的有害影响。虽然1918年和1957年的大流行是流感可能造成破坏的近期例子,但即使在典型年份,流感感染及相关并发症也会导致大量发病和死亡。20世纪40年代流感疫苗的研制标志着这种疾病管理的一个重大转折点。对老年人和其他高危患者进行疫苗接种已被证明可以降低发病率和死亡率,从经济角度来看是一项值得的投资。尽管有这些益处,但该群体中疫苗的使用仍未达到最佳水平。对于流感相关并发症风险较低的个体,每年接种疫苗的作用仍存在争议。虽然通过接种疫苗进行预防相对简单,但用药物治疗有症状的流感样疾病则更为复杂。区分流感病毒引起的症状与其他常见病毒引起的症状很困难。目前用于确定流感为病因的检测方法要么过于昂贵,要么不够准确,要么耗时过长,无法影响治疗。基于症状的诊断仍然是临床实践中最常用的策略。神经氨酸酶抑制剂(NIs)——扎那米韦和奥司他韦——的获批让医疗服务提供者意识到诊断和治疗流感的困难。已证明NIs在症状出现的头2天内给药时可缩短流感感染者的症状持续时间。然而,这些创新药物是否具有成本效益,需要更详细地了解这些药物相对于现有疗法可能提供的益处。在本综述中,我们研究了流感感染的负担、诊断挑战以及现有干预措施的临床和经济影响。还探讨了临床争议和进一步研究的潜在领域。