Suppr超能文献

一种深度水解乳清配方奶粉的低过敏性

Hypoallergenicity of an extensively hydrolyzed whey formula.

作者信息

Giampietro P G, Kjellman N I, Oldaeus G, Wouters-Wesseling W, Businco L

机构信息

Department of Paediatrics, University La Sapienza, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2001 Apr;12(2):83-6. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-3038.2001.012002083.x.

Abstract

Several different protein hydrolysate-based infant formulas have been promoted as hypoallergenic and considered suitable for the dietary management of cow's milk allergy (CMA). Accepting that none of the hydrolysate-based products is completely safe, the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) recommends that these formulas should be tested in a double-blind placebo-controlled setting and tolerated by at least 90% of children with proven CMA. In principle, this recommendation is also endorsed by the European Society of Paediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition (ESPGAN) and the European Society of Paediatric Allergy and Clinical Immunology (ESPACI). In this two-center study, 32 children with proven CMA were tested with the extensive hydrolysate whey formula Nutrilon Pepti, for comparison with Profylac (extensive) and Nan HA (partial) whey hydrolysate products. Skin-prick tests (SPTs) were, respectively, positive to the three hydrolysate formulas in 19%, 15%, and 32% of children. After oral challenge it was concluded that 97% (95% CI: 85-100%) of the children tolerated Nutrilon Pepti, 94% (95% CI: 75-100%) tolerated Profylac, and 64% (95% CI: 37-81%) tolerated Nan HA. This study demonstrates that the extensive hydrolysates Nutrilon Pepti and Profylac are well tolerated in a population of children with proven CMA and that both products can be considered safe for their intended use. This study confirms that a very small number of children react even to extensively hydrolyzed formulas. SPT prior to oral exposure to the hydrolysate-based formulas can indicate whether a child is at risk of showing reactions to the product. Introduction of new products to these children should be carried out under a doctor's supervision. However, the majority of the SPT-positive children did tolerate the two extensively hydrolyzed whey-based formulas tested.

摘要

几种不同的基于蛋白质水解物的婴儿配方奶粉已被宣传为低敏配方,并被认为适用于牛奶过敏(CMA)的饮食管理。鉴于没有一种基于水解物的产品是完全安全的,美国儿科学会(AAP)建议这些配方奶粉应在双盲安慰剂对照试验中进行测试,并且至少90%确诊为CMA的儿童应能耐受。原则上,这一建议也得到了欧洲儿科胃肠病学和营养学会(ESPGAN)以及欧洲儿科过敏和临床免疫学会(ESPACI)的认可。在这项双中心研究中,32名确诊为CMA的儿童使用深度水解乳清配方奶粉纽迪希亚肽敏舒进行测试,以与普瑞乐素(深度)和能恩HA(部分)乳清水解产品作比较。皮肤点刺试验(SPT)中,分别有19%、15%和32%的儿童对这三种水解配方奶粉呈阳性反应。口服激发试验后得出结论,97%(95%置信区间:85%-100%)的儿童能耐受纽迪希亚肽敏舒,94%(95%置信区间:75%-100%)能耐受普瑞乐素,64%(95%置信区间:37%-81%)能耐受能恩HA。这项研究表明,深度水解配方奶粉纽迪希亚肽敏舒和普瑞乐素在确诊为CMA的儿童群体中耐受性良好,这两种产品在预期用途上均可被视为安全。这项研究证实,极少数儿童甚至对深度水解配方奶粉也会产生反应。口服基于水解物的配方奶粉前进行SPT可以表明儿童是否有对该产品出现反应的风险。向这些儿童引入新产品应在医生监督下进行。然而,大多数SPT呈阳性的儿童确实耐受了所测试的两种深度水解乳清基配方奶粉。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验