Terracciano Luigi, Isoardi Patrizia, Arrigoni Sergio, Zoja Alexa, Martelli Alberto
Department of Child and Maternal Medicine, The Melloni Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2002 Dec;89(6 Suppl 1):86-90. doi: 10.1016/s1081-1206(10)62130-8.
Hydrolyzed formulas (HFs) are in general well tolerated by children with cow's milk allergy (CMA), although cases of allergic reactions have been reported and residual allergenicity of HF has been demonstrated
To review the most relevant studies of the HFs for residual allergenicity, tolerance, and safety in the past 20 years.
MEDLINE searches for the years 1970 to 2001 using the following algorithm (hydrolysate and allergy; food intolerance/allergy; protein hydrolysate).
The literature confirmed that although some antigenicity remains, HFs are well tolerated by children with CMA. Rice HF has proven safe when tested by double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge in a study population of 18 children allergic both to cow's milk (CM) and soy protein.
Absolute avoidance of CM proteins means substitution by soy-, rice-, or amino acid-based formulas. As 8 to 14% of infants allergic to CM react to soy and amino acid-based formulas are expensive, scientific societies recommend the use of formulas based on extensively hydrolyzed CM proteins as first alternatives in children with CMA. Although both soy- and rice-based HFs have now been shown to be safe for these children, further nutritional and clinical studies are needed.
水解配方奶粉(HFs)通常被牛奶过敏(CMA)儿童很好地耐受,尽管已有过敏反应病例报道,并且已证实HF存在残余变应原性。
回顾过去20年中关于HFs残余变应原性、耐受性和安全性的最相关研究。
使用以下算法(水解产物与过敏;食物不耐受/过敏;蛋白质水解产物)对1970年至2001年期间的MEDLINE进行检索。
文献证实,尽管仍存在一些抗原性,但HFs被CMA儿童很好地耐受。在一项针对18名对牛奶(CM)和大豆蛋白均过敏的儿童的研究人群中,通过双盲、安慰剂对照食物激发试验测试,大米HF已被证明是安全的。
绝对避免CM蛋白意味着用大豆、大米或氨基酸基配方奶粉替代。由于8%至14%对CM过敏的婴儿对大豆有反应,且氨基酸基配方奶粉价格昂贵,科学协会建议在CMA儿童中首先使用基于深度水解CM蛋白的配方奶粉作为替代品。尽管现在已证明大豆和大米基HFs对这些儿童是安全的,但仍需要进一步的营养和临床研究。