Trussell J, Wiebe E, Shochet T, Guilbert E
Office of Population Research, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544, USA.
Obstet Gynecol. 2001 May;97(5 Pt 1):789-93. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(01)01333-3.
To estimate cost savings from emergency contraceptive pills in Canada.
We modeled cost savings when a single emergency contraceptive treatment was provided after unprotected intercourse and when women were provided emergency contraceptive pills in advance.
Each dollar spent on a single treatment saved $1.19--$2.35 (in Canadian currency), depending on the regimen and on assumptions about savings from costs avoided by preventing mistimed births. The dedicated products Preven (Shire Canada, Inc., Oakville, Ontario) and Plan B (Paladin Labs, Inc., Montreal) were cost-saving even under the least favorable assumption that mistimed births prevented today occur 2 years later. Each dollar spent on advance provision of Preven saved $1.24--$12.23, depending on the regular contraception method, on how consistently emergency contraception was used when needed, and on whether mistimed births were averted forever or simply delayed. Plan B was almost always cost-saving, although less so.
Emergency contraception was cost-saving whether provided when the emergency occurred or in advance to be used as needed. More extensive use of emergency contraception could save considerable medical costs by reducing unintended pregnancies.
评估加拿大紧急避孕药的成本节约情况。
我们建立了模型,以评估在无保护性交后提供单次紧急避孕治疗以及提前为女性提供紧急避孕药时的成本节约情况。
根据治疗方案以及关于预防早产所避免成本的节约假设,每花费1加元用于单次治疗可节省1.19 - 2.35加元(加拿大货币)。即使在最不利的假设下,即假设今天预防的早产在两年后才发生,专用产品Preven(加拿大夏尔公司,安大略省奥克维尔)和Plan B(帕拉丁实验室公司,蒙特利尔)仍具有成本节约效益。每花费1加元提前提供Preven可节省1.24 - 12.23加元,这取决于常规避孕方法、在需要时紧急避孕的使用一致性以及早产是否被永远避免或只是被推迟。Plan B几乎总是具有成本节约效益,尽管节约幅度较小。
无论是在紧急情况发生时提供紧急避孕,还是提前提供以备需要时使用,紧急避孕都具有成本节约效益。更广泛地使用紧急避孕可通过减少意外怀孕节省可观的医疗成本。