Suppr超能文献

一种用于初级保健中青少年的身体活动筛查措施。

A physical activity screening measure for use with adolescents in primary care.

作者信息

Prochaska J J, Sallis J F, Long B

机构信息

San Diego State University, 6363 Alvarado Ct, Suite 250, San Diego, CA 92120, USA.

出版信息

Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2001 May;155(5):554-9. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.155.5.554.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To develop a reliable and valid physical activity screening measure for use with adolescents in primary care settings.

STUDY DESIGN

We conducted 2 studies to evaluate the test-retest reliability and concurrent validity of 6 single-item and 3 composite measures of physical activity. Modifications were based on the findings of the 2 studies, and a best measure was evaluated in study 3. Accelerometer data served as the criterion standard for tests of validity.

RESULTS

In study 1 (N = 250; mean age, 15 years; 56% female; 36% white), reports on the composite measures were most reliable. In study 2 (N = 57; mean age, 14 years; 65% female; 37% white), 6 of the 9 screening measures correlated significantly with accelerometer data. Subjects, however, had great difficulty reporting bouts of activity and distinguishing between intensity levels. Instead, we developed a single measure assessing accumulation of 60 minutes of moderate to vigorous physical activity. Evaluated in study 3 (N = 148; mean age, 12 years; 65% female; 27% white), the measure was reliable (intraclass correlation, 0.77) and correlated significantly (r = 0.40, P<.001) with accelerometer data. Correct classification (63%), sensitivity (71%), and false-positive rates (40%) were reasonable.

CONCLUSION

The "moderate to vigorous physical activity" screening measure is recommended for clinical practice with adolescents.

摘要

目的

开发一种可靠且有效的身体活动筛查方法,用于基层医疗环境中的青少年。

研究设计

我们进行了两项研究,以评估6项单项和3项综合身体活动测量方法的重测信度和同时效度。根据这两项研究的结果进行了修改,并在研究3中评估了最佳测量方法。加速度计数据用作效度测试的标准。

结果

在研究1(N = 250;平均年龄15岁;56%为女性;36%为白人)中,综合测量方法的报告最可靠。在研究2(N = 57;平均年龄14岁;65%为女性;37%为白人)中,9项筛查测量方法中的6项与加速度计数据显著相关。然而,受试者在报告活动发作和区分强度水平方面存在很大困难。相反,我们开发了一种单一测量方法,评估60分钟中等至剧烈身体活动的累积量。在研究3(N = 148;平均年龄12岁;65%为女性;27%为白人)中进行评估,该测量方法可靠(组内相关系数为0.77),并与加速度计数据显著相关(r = 0.40,P <.001)。正确分类(63%)、敏感度(71%)和假阳性率(40%)是合理的。

结论

推荐使用“中等至剧烈身体活动”筛查方法对青少年进行临床实践。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验