Basso D, Gallo N, Guariso G, Pittoni M, Piva M G, Plebani M
Department of Laboratory Medicine, University Hospital of Padua, Italy.
J Clin Lab Anal. 2001;15(3):112-5. doi: 10.1002/jcla.1012.
The aims of this study were: (1) to compare the diagnostic efficacy for celiac disease (CD) diagnosis of serum determination of anti-gliadin (AG) (IgA and IgG) and anti-endomysium (AE) with that of anti-transglutaminase (AtTG); and (2) to compare the accuracy of four different assays to measure AtTG. We studied 72 children: the histological diagnosis of CD was made in 38 cases and excluded in the remaining 34 children. In fasting sera we measured AE, AG-IgA and IgG, and AtTG, the latter with four different commercial kits (Eurospital, Medipan, Inova, Arnika). Moreover AtTG was measured in a group of 58 CD children after a gluten-free diet. AE was positive in all but 1 case of CD patients (sensitivity = 97%); false positive results were found in 1/34 controls (specificity = 97%). When a specificity of 95% was fixed, the sensitivities were 97% for AE, 83% for AG-IgA, and 63% for AG-IgG; the sensitivities of anti-tTG were 90, 84, 84, and 75% when measured with Eurospital, Medipan, Inova, and Arnika kits respectively. The new AtTG seems to be accurate enough to be proposed as a noninvasive diagnostic tool for CD diagnosis; the 4 kits analyzed showed similar diagnostic efficacy.
(1)比较血清抗麦醇溶蛋白(AG)(IgA和IgG)、抗肌内膜(AE)及抗转谷氨酰胺酶(AtTG)检测对乳糜泻(CD)的诊断效能;(2)比较四种不同检测方法测定AtTG的准确性。我们研究了72名儿童:38例确诊为CD,其余34名儿童排除CD诊断。在空腹血清中,我们检测了AE、AG-IgA、AG-IgG及AtTG,其中AtTG使用四种不同的商业试剂盒(Eurospital、Medipan、Inova、Arnika)进行检测。此外,对一组58例CD患儿在无麸质饮食后检测了AtTG。除1例CD患者外,其余所有CD患者的AE均为阳性(敏感性=97%);在34名对照者中有1例出现假阳性结果(特异性=97%)。当设定特异性为95%时,AE的敏感性为97%,AG-IgA为83%,AG-IgG为63%;使用Eurospital、Medipan、Inova和Arnika试剂盒检测时,抗tTG的敏感性分别为90%、84%、84%和75%。新型AtTG似乎足够准确,可作为CD诊断的非侵入性诊断工具;所分析的4种试剂盒显示出相似的诊断效能。